Champions League Final - Liverpool v Tottenham |
Post Reply | Page <1 1415161718> |
Author | ||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
"With his arm already outstretched, it is quite clear that Sissoko did not “deliberately” handle the ball." (The key word is "already") Anyhow moving on to the new Law which will be in place from next season, as that article also points out, the requirement for deliberate intent will effectively be removed, leaving even entirely accidental contact to be deemed "handball". Now consider Liverpool's second goal in the game: In that picture, Alderweireld is doing everything physically possible to avoid hand contact with the ball. Yet had Origi aimed for the top corner of the net, rather than the bottom corner, the ball might very well have struck Alderweireld on his left sleeve. And next season, that would be a penalty! How is that fair? EDIT: Why does the feckin picture link not work half the time? Anyhow, the link is here, if anyone can post it up:
Edited by Territorial - 04 Jun 2019 at 2:09pm |
||||||
Sponsored Links | ||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Its a pointless argument to make for the vast majority of penalties, as most of them, unless they're Suarez v Ghana type incidents, are not deliberate. You tried to argue last night in your post that it couldn't be a penalty as Sissoko's handball wasn't deliberate. That's nonsense. It may not have been deliberate, but that doesn't make it not a penalty. The vast majority of penalties given for hand ball are not deliberate hand balls. Therefore the word deliberate is pointless in the rule book and obsolete in arguing about the majority of penalty decisions. |
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I was going to explain, for the nth time, my reasoning as to why that's not applicable in this instance (i.e it doesn't pass the prior "deliberate" test). But you know what? Faced with an entirely out-of-context comment like that, I suspect I'd have better luck trying to trying to explain Perspective to Father Dougal: Edited by Territorial - 04 Jun 2019 at 2:26pm |
||||||
Cabra Hoop
Roy Keane Joined: 06 Feb 2012 Location: Royal County Status: Offline Points: 10838 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
What is a "natural" position for an arm to be on a football pitch ? On a serious note, throughout every match players are pointing at their own players to track opponents, gesticulating at team mates, appealing for decisions etc. etc. I think Sissoko had his hand up to make his own teamn mates aware of someone coming in at the back post. Clever thinking of Mane to see this and aim for the arm..
Edited by Cabra Hoop - 04 Jun 2019 at 2:36pm |
||||||
" BFC always gives me a laugh........ "
|
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I would not make such a sweeping claim. Or anything like it.
So you concede that it may not have been deliberate, yet you still consider that it deserved to be given as a penalty, despite the very first line of the relevant Law stating: HANDLING THE BALL It is an offence if a player:
OK, you originally decided that it was a penalty, fair enough - lot's of well-paid pundits etc, who might be expected to know and understand the Laws of the game agreed. But when it is pointed out to you in black and white that for it to constitute "handball, the contact has to be deliberate, you stick to your guns, even while accepting that Sissoko's contact "may not have been deliberate" [sic]. "Ah you see, ref, I know that's what it says in the rules, but you have to ignore them, since it doesn't suit me. In fact, they're very inconvenient..."
Edited by Territorial - 04 Jun 2019 at 2:40pm |
||||||
HuntysCousin
Jack Charlton Joined: 26 Sep 2011 Location: Waterford Status: Offline Points: 5241 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Definite penalty. Case closed.
|
||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Terri, are either of these penalties that were awarded in recent times deliberate hand balls? And also, tell me if you think the correct decision was made in either of them:
Danny Rose Spurs vs Man City Kimpembe PSG vs Man United |
||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
What about this one Terri? A penalty, yes or no? Deliberate, yes or no? |
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
This smacks for all the world of someone losing their own argument, so pointing to someone elses to try to save them. Or "whataboutery", as it's otherwise known.
|
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
See above answer.
|
||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I made it as simple possible for you, all I was looking for was a yes or no to two questions on 3 different incidents. Deliberate yes or no, do you think it was a penalty yes or no. Simple.
no whataboutery here, just trying to back up my point that incidents can lead to deserved penalties when the handballs aren't deliberate. IMO the vast majority of penatlies awarded for handballs fall into this category. Pogba example - he didn't deliberately handle the ball, but its definitely the correct decision Same with Danny Rose. |
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Oh, and none of them exactly like the Sissoko example." Rumpole of the Bailey you ain't, that's for sure!
Edited by Territorial - 04 Jun 2019 at 3:33pm |
||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Well no handball in the box is deliberate unless it’s a defender punching it off the line with the keeper beaten, so all the other types of penalties awarded for handballs fall into this category that I’m referring to. Hence, the vast majority.
|
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Jeez, how to miss the point! With all three of the examples you cited, the ball clearly struck the player's arm only. Now we could argue all day as to whether those should have been penalties (personally I thought all three were harsh, but just about arguable, I suppose). But in any case, they are no more like Sissoko's case than eg a defender punching it off the line with the keeper beaten. The difference being here that the ball struck Sissoko's chest first, meaning that regardless of his body shape etc, that contact simply could not have been a penalty. Which leaves the referee to assess the second contact, which did hit his arm. And it is my firm belief that it was perverse of the ref to determine that Sissoko could physically have reacted in time deliberately to handle a ball which flew off another part of his body virtually instantaneously. Which interpretation is actually explicitly backed up if you scroll further down the guidance notes, to where they state: ... it is not usually an offence if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm:
Note that they make a distinction between the ball coming off a player's own body and coming off that of another player. That is, they recognise that a player may have time to react should the ball deflect off another player, who may eg be several feet away, but accept that it is exceptionally difficult to react when it flies up from your own body, as in this case.
Edited by Territorial - 04 Jun 2019 at 3:56pm |
||||||
planning
Ray Houghton Football version of Comical Ali. Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 3836 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
My thoughts haven't changed. One replay is all I needed to conclude it was a penalty. Most refs these days have zero tolerance of handball in the box, that's why a pen was given in the World Cup Final, and why lots of other handballs were given as penalties in that tournament, why they've been given in this tournament, and will be given in next year's EPL. The ref gave a pen, then Danny Makkelie and 3 other VAR officials saw no grounds to review or reverse the decision, and they know every rule inside out. VAR's see absolutely everything from every angle, and if they say it's a penalty, I trust their judgement. Most pundits and the press tbf agree it was the correct decision. No doubt you will still protest about it, but it's not going to change anything. I love VAR. It helps out referees, it cuts down on dark arts football and it ensures the big decisions are correct. The only issue I have is communication levels. I want to hear what the refs are saying, it would be a massive help. It should all be in English, as it's their common language, but it doesn't have to be, there's enough translators around to sort that out, if the will is there to do it.
|
||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I think you've totally missed my point. It wasn't necessarily in reference to the penalty in the final on Saturday night. More a general point and something that I've said numerous times on here over the years It can be non deliberate and still be a penalty. Countless times a season we see this type of penalty rightly awarded. That's my point. To say it wasn't a penalty because Sissoko didn't deliberately handle the ball is nonsense IMO. It may be an incorrect decision for other factors, but not this one. Sure what handballs in the box are actually deliberate?
|
||||||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
(Oh and btw, just because you say something "numerous times on here over the years" doesn't make it right.)
"It is an offence if a player... ... deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm" Inconvenient, isn't it?
"Countless"? Occasionally, perhaps, but unless/until you can come up with some hard statistics, then 3 or 4 high-profile examples out of the hundreds given each season does not support your case. Doesn't even come close, in fact.
Or do you believe eg, that where a referee gives a penalty for a foul which TV subsequently showed to be outside the area, we should blithely ignore that particular requirement? Yeah, that'll be it. Let's just heed the Laws of the game where it suits, and ignore them when it doesn't.
And regardless of other (non-comparable) decisions in other matches featuring other referees etc, it will have been simply incorrect if the ref determined that handball does not have to be deliberate. Alternatively, it will have been perverse of him to agree that handballs should be deliberate, and that Sissoko's contact was such. For not only do the actual circumstances make such an interpretation extremely difficult to sustain, but the guidance notes to the Law specifically state: "... it is not usually an offence if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm... ... directly from the player’s own head or body (including the foot)" |
||||||
Roberto Baggio
Robbie Keane UNBELIEVABLE JEFF Joined: 28 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 37333 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I watch a lot of football and can't think of a single incident in the last season where a defender deliberately handled the ball in the box, unless he's punching it off the line to prevent a goal, which rightly results in a red card.
Not one. You're distorting the argument as usual with needless paragraph after paragraph. The word deliberate is pointless when discussing handballs in the box, unless its the ones that result in a red card. |
||||||
Post Reply | Page <1 1415161718> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |