You Boys in Green Homepage YBIG Shop
Forum Home Forum Home : International : Rest of The World
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - VAR sytem
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


VAR sytem

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5152535455 72>
Author
Message
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 2:01pm
VAR whereby the referee can satisfy themselves of the decision they made makes absolute sense. The current guise, which is not like that at the WC 18 is not up to the job.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
planning View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton

Football version of Comical Ali.

Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 3836
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote planning Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 2:15pm
Originally posted by Hans Moleman Hans Moleman wrote:

You don't understand because you are a complete fool Planning. VAR in it's current guise is absolute rot. It has killed game after game and the decision making has not been better btw. Offsides that cannot possibly be called due to inferior technology, red cards not given when clear as day, diving absolutely rampant in the game with no deterrent, absolute chaos around referees with constant abuse and surrounding of referees by players.

VAR is an absolute blight on football. It should be binned. If they actually have a proper setup in a few years time, by all means use it then. As it stands now, it is nonsense.

So you prove my point again. You haven't got the message. You have not proposed a viable alternative, beyond scrap it. Well sorry, no can do. You cannot go back to a less accurate form of refereeing. It's absolutely impossible. 

VAR stepped in 3 times in the EPL at the weekend to correct 3 major errors that under your alternative, would stand and ruin the games. As my sig states, it's cleaning the crap out of football, once and for all. Wrong decisions ruin football, correct decisions are what we need, and we get a lot more of them now than we ever did before. 
VAR: Cutting the crap out of football.
Back to Top
Fruice View Drop Down
Liam Brady
Liam Brady


Joined: 22 Nov 2014
Location: Cork
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Fruice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 3:01pm
VAR as it stands does impact on atmosphere for sure but the game is fairer as a result of VAR.

Still elements open to personal interpretation but more decisions have been got right because of it and that is a good thing.
Back to Top
Hans Moleman View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane
Avatar
Muff: That is a lie and you are a liar

Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 10199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hans Moleman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 3:07pm
Originally posted by planning planning wrote:

Originally posted by Hans Moleman Hans Moleman wrote:

You don't understand because you are a complete fool Planning. VAR in it's current guise is absolute rot. It has killed game after game and the decision making has not been better btw. Offsides that cannot possibly be called due to inferior technology, red cards not given when clear as day, diving absolutely rampant in the game with no deterrent, absolute chaos around referees with constant abuse and surrounding of referees by players.

VAR is an absolute blight on football. It should be binned. If they actually have a proper setup in a few years time, by all means use it then. As it stands now, it is nonsense.

So you prove my point again. You haven't got the message. You have not proposed a viable alternative, beyond scrap it. Well sorry, no can do. You cannot go back to a less accurate form of refereeing. It's absolutely impossible. 

VAR stepped in 3 times in the EPL at the weekend to correct 3 major errors that under your alternative, would stand and ruin the games. As my sig states, it's cleaning the crap out of football, once and for all. Wrong decisions ruin football, correct decisions are what we need, and we get a lot more of them now than we ever did before. 

Just more white noise. I'm surprised you didn't bring up Henry which tbf is a credit to you, as I know you really really wanted to.
"I called him an embarrassment to FIFA and to himself," .... He said 'No-one speaks to me like that'.... and I said, "well I do' and that was that."
Back to Top
Croftman View Drop Down
Liam Brady
Liam Brady
Avatar

Joined: 18 Aug 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 2554
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Croftman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 4:16pm
Has to stay but has to be modified and they have to do something about letting people in the stadiums know what's actually happening
Some people just deserve a slap
Back to Top
SuperDave84 View Drop Down
Robbie Keane
Robbie Keane
Avatar
ooh Thomas, how could you do this to me!

Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Location: Far Fungannon
Status: Offline
Points: 21384
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SuperDave84 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 4:17pm
Originally posted by planning planning wrote:

Originally posted by Hans Moleman Hans Moleman wrote:

The whole setup is sh*t. Just bin it.

I will never understand why people call for VAR to be binned, because it didn't make a decision. Like, what is the alternative if it is binned? Confused The original decision on the pitch stands anyway.

Some people obviously still haven't got the message that VAR will never ever ever be scrapped. It will be reviewed, modified at times, but it will never be scrapped. Following the election of the new FIFA President, it's grown rapidly  from obscure tournaments to the top table of club and international football in less than 5 years. It's only going to expand further into lower leagues and even more competitions. We get our first experience of it in Bratislava, and we will probably need it to intervene in our favour at some point down the line, because the ref on the pitch made a serious error. 

I'm sure if you asked most refs if they would rather have the safety of a review available, or face the Buffon treatment after every decision made, they would much prefer the former. This is the future of officiating, and there's no going back. 


Yeah, if, in a hypothetical universe, you gave anyone a choice involving only two entirely artificial and unrealistic options, one of which was a gross exaggeration of something that happens rarely enough, they'd definitely pick the alternative.... I'm not sure that furthers the argument in favour of VAR though.
Back to Top
Territorial View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 5817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Territorial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 6:06pm
Originally posted by planning planning wrote:


I'm sure if you asked most refs if they would rather have the safety of a review available, or face the Buffon treatment after every decision made, they would much prefer the former.

As I noted earlier:
"Meanwhile, I was speaking to a FL referee a few weeks back. He was saying that his PL colleagues absolutely HATE it, since it's wrecked their confidence in their own decision-making. I think he meant that the threat of being constantly "second-guessed" is leading to them hesitating, or trying to referee towards the VAR, rather than what they're actually seeing in front of them."

As an FL official, he has no dog in this particular fight (yet, at any rate), but he surely flagged up one unintended/unforeseen consequence.

Plus the fact that I've been at games where fans of BOTH teams were chanting "Fcuk VAR" etc, so they/we don't like it, either.

Meanwhile, I've yet to hear a manager come out categorically in support of VAR as an all-round "good thing" (at least since they've had a chance to see it in operation).

But apart from that... LOL
Back to Top
Territorial View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 5817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Territorial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 7:57pm
Excellent piece on VAR here:

In particular, she (and @HelenHet20) nail it with:
"... crowds want big truths, not small ones. VAR succeeds not if it gets 'more right decisions', but if fans & players think it improves the game. Like most governance, it's about consensus. If people think VAR is working, it's working. If they don't, it's not."

And all the fans I'm talking to think it's not.
Back to Top
planning View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton

Football version of Comical Ali.

Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 3836
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote planning Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 8:05pm
Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

 As an FL official, he has no dog in this particular fight (yet, at any rate), but he surely flagged up one unintended/unforeseen consequence.

Plus the fact that I've been at games where fans of BOTH teams were chanting "Fcuk VAR" etc, so they/we don't like it, either.

Meanwhile, I've yet to hear a manager come out categorically in support of VAR as an all-round "good thing" (at least since they've had a chance to see it in operation).

But apart from that...

And you believe him. Fair enough. 

What I believe is that, no referee has come out of the game, retired or resigned in any country on earth over the past 5 years, citing VAR reducing his power to make decisions, as the reason. By contrast, I have heard many referees who don't have VAR available, speak about the pressure they feel under, the horrendous level of stick they have to take on and off the pitch for getting a decision wrong. Or even right. And that's just at the highest level, let alone the Sunday kickabout down the park. Some have found it too much and resigned down the years because of it, therefore I believe the vast majority of referees want and welcome a second chance to get a major decision right, and make their jobs that bit easier to do. As it's name suggests, the VAR is there to assist him, nor hinder him.

As regards the howling at the moon in stadiums, it has achieved nothing in the past 6 months, or indeed in the past 2 years since it was introduced in the cups. And it will achieve nothing. The culture of the game since the year dot was always to treat the ref and his officials as a running punchbag, to pressurise, intimidate, influence, and hold responsible for every decision against them. The 4th Official still gets an earful off coaches, even though his powers  basically amount to holding up an info board. Now all involved have to accept that the right decision will be made more often than not. The culture is changing. Every fan who now enters a stadium is fully aware that VAR is in operation and may be required to intervene at some point. They still show up. VAR is permanent, this is Football Fair Play in action, and they have two choices, either adapt to it or find something else to do with their time. 

Originally posted by Hans Moleman Hans Moleman wrote:

Just more white noise. I'm surprised you didn't bring up Henry which tbf is a credit to you, as I know you really really wanted to.

All you've posted on the thread is populist myths. While you were doing it again, I went off to scan the latest facts. In the EPL so far, 

75 wrong decisions (outrages/injustices/diving/cheating) changed. 1/3.3 games

9 Goals awarded
35 ghost goals disallowed.

12 more penalties awarded than last season. 
4 ghost penalties (outrages/injustices/diving/cheating) cancelled.

3 red cards rescinded i.e. 3 players saved from automatic 3 game bans they would serve without VAR in operation. 

Mistaken Identity cases: 0.

Average time taken per decision: 91 seconds. 

I'm sure the EPL/PGMOL can just roll out them stats when people sing about VAR and can't come up with alternatives, beyond calling for the impossible. 
VAR: Cutting the crap out of football.
Back to Top
Hans Moleman View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane
Avatar
Muff: That is a lie and you are a liar

Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 10199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hans Moleman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 9:21pm
LOL you are absolutely deluded. 

You've claimed that with VAR, it basically made mouthing at the ref, intimidation of the ref, and surrounding of the ref by the players non existent. Where do you stand on that now?

You've claimed that with VAR, penalties would be given for handballs left, right, and centre and this is how football will be going forward. That was complete nonsense. Where do you stand on that now?

You've claimed that offside decisions are black and white and VAR cannot get these wrong, which is a complete myth. Where do you stand on that now?

You claimed that all supporters and people involved in the game care about are the correct decisions, no matter if the VAR spends an eternity looking over the most ridiculous of calls. Almost every football supporter absolutely hates the delays and the killing of the flow of the game (the most important thing in football imo in comparison to other sports). You believe that none of that matters and if it becomes like rugby or cricket, so be it - where do you stand on that now?

You've claimed countless times that diving will be non existent with VAR. It is clearly a rampant problem still in the game and VAR has not even got the jurisdiction to deal with it in most cases - where do you stand on that now?


"I called him an embarrassment to FIFA and to himself," .... He said 'No-one speaks to me like that'.... and I said, "well I do' and that was that."
Back to Top
planning View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton

Football version of Comical Ali.

Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 3836
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote planning Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 10:39pm
Originally posted by Hans Moleman Hans Moleman wrote:

You've claimed that with VAR, it basically made mouthing at the ref, intimidation of the ref, and surrounding of the ref by the players non existent. Where do you stand on that now?

You've claimed that with VAR, penalties would be given for handballs left, right, and centre and this is how football will be going forward. That was complete nonsense. Where do you stand on that now?

You've claimed that offside decisions are black and white and VAR cannot get these wrong, which is a complete myth. Where do you stand on that now?

You claimed that all supporters and people involved in the game care about are the correct decisions, no matter if the VAR spends an eternity looking over the most ridiculous of calls. Almost every football supporter absolutely hates the delays and the killing of the flow of the game (the most important thing in football imo in comparison to other sports). You believe that none of that matters and if it becomes like rugby or cricket, so be it - where do you stand on that now?

You've claimed countless times that diving will be non existent with VAR. It is clearly a rampant problem still in the game and VAR has not even got the jurisdiction to deal with it in most cases - where do you stand on that now?

It's not a rampant problem. Any forward who dives in the box now has been, and will be caught and penalised. My stance has not changed.

VAR is there to get the right decision, so if the right decision is made, (and  most agree the right decision is made) it is the only thing that counts. My stance has not changed. There are many stoppages in a game as it is without VAR, up to 20 minutes total in most cases, sometimes more. It wasn't an issue before VAR, and it's not an issue now. It's not time wasting, it's doing a job, and it takes as long as it takes. It then gives the time "lost" back in stoppage time at the end of the game.

Offside decisions are black and white. My stance has not changed. While glaring inaccuracies between what the ref sees on the pitch and what the VAR sees on the screen, such as Chelsea v Bournemouth, are rightly corrected on the spot. That is not possible without VAR, and that goal may ultimately be the difference between who stays up and who does not. 

VAR is giving penalties for handball offences, across the world. To claim or imply otherwise, is wrong. 

The RRA monitor has been used twice in the EPL. When the final decision after both incidents was made, there was no protest of any kind from either the players or management from both teams. The decision was accepted by everyone. Therefore, my stance has not changed. 

People call for VAR to be scrapped. They are completely delusional. Honestly, there is more chance of West Ham going back to Upton Park again. I know they want to, but the fact is, they can't. 

End of story.
VAR: Cutting the crap out of football.
Back to Top
Hans Moleman View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane
Avatar
Muff: That is a lie and you are a liar

Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 10199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hans Moleman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 10:46pm
Absolute garbage. Every single word of that.
"I called him an embarrassment to FIFA and to himself," .... He said 'No-one speaks to me like that'.... and I said, "well I do' and that was that."
Back to Top
Territorial View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 5817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Territorial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 10:54pm
Originally posted by planning planning wrote:

Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

 As an FL official, he has no dog in this particular fight (yet, at any rate), but he surely flagged up one unintended/unforeseen consequence.

And you believe him. Fair enough.

Of course I believe him. I've known him for years, he volunteered the information before knowing my own take on the issue, he's not been subject to it himself and he has no reason to lie.

Originally posted by planning planning wrote:

Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

 
Plus the fact that I've been at games where fans of BOTH teams were chanting "Fcuk VAR" etc, so they/we don't like it, either.

Meanwhile, I've yet to hear a manager come out categorically in support of VAR as an all-round "good thing" (at least since they've had a chance to see it in operation).

But apart from that...
What I believe is that, no referee has come out of the game, retired or resigned in any country on earth over the past 5 years, citing VAR reducing his power to make decisions, as the reason.
It's barely been introduced, ffs! Moreover, it's only in the elite leagues, where referees are full-time (or as good as). Do you really expect them to jeopardise/abandon their career, which may only have a couple of years to run, over this?
Meanwhile, no serving referee is EVER going to come out and condemn it, since that would be career suicide.

Originally posted by planning planning wrote:

By contrast, I have heard many referees who don't have VAR available, speak about the pressure they feel under, the horrendous level of stick they have to take on and off the pitch for getting a decision wrong. Or even right. And that's just at the highest level, let alone the Sunday kickabout down the park. Some have found it too much and resigned down the years because of it, therefore I believe the vast majority of referees want and welcome a second chance to get a major decision right, and make their jobs that bit easier to do. As it's name suggests, the VAR is there to assist him, nor hinder him.
You don't need to tell me about that - my brother used to be a referee, to a decent standard, and then until rmore ecently, a referee's assessor.
But for all that referees get unwarranted abuse as you describe, 99.9% of them are never going to referee under VAR.
And as my pal commented, the 0.1% who do don't like it (he used the term "hate it"), it's just that they cannot come out and say so.

Originally posted by planning planning wrote:

As regards the howling at the moon in stadiums, it has achieved nothing in the past 6 months, or indeed in the past 2 years since it was introduced in the cups. And it will achieve nothing. The culture of the game since the year dot was always to treat the ref and his officials as a running punchbag, to pressurise, intimidate, influence, and hold responsible for every decision against them. The 4th Official still gets an earful off coaches, even though his powers  basically amount to holding up an info board. Now all involved have to accept that the right decision will be made more often than not. The culture is changing. Every fan who now enters a stadium is fully aware that VAR is in operation and may be required to intervene at some point. They still show up. VAR is permanent, this is Football Fair Play in action, and they have two choices, either adapt to it or find something else to do with their time. 
I've now been to a dozen games or so games with VAR. I can tell you now that I've yet to find any single supporter, home or away, who think it a good thing. Which is why we uniformly express our displeasure by booing etc, as fans are won't to do.

As for your "choice" (take it or leave), why should we be forced into either?

VAR is for the professional game only, and the elite level of the professional game at that.

And it should never be forgotten that ultimately, the only thing which distinguishes pro football from the amateur version played by millions of people all over the world is that the former is supported (literally and figuratively) by the thousands who pay good money every week to watch the games.

And you would effectively tell us to piss off if we don't like what we're getting?

Would you tell that to the players, pundits, managers and (ahem) referees who don't like it either? Confused
Back to Top
planning View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton

Football version of Comical Ali.

Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 3836
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote planning Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Feb 2020 at 11:52pm
Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

Of course I believe him. I've known him for years, he volunteered the information before knowing my own take on the issue, he's not been subject to it himself and he has no reason to lie.

It's barely been introduced, ffs! Moreover, it's only in the elite leagues, where referees are full-time (or as good as). Do you really expect them to jeopardise/abandon their career, which may only have a couple of years to run, over this?
Meanwhile, no serving referee is EVER going to come out and condemn it, since that would be career suicide.

You don't need to tell me about that - my brother used to be a referee, to a decent standard, and then until rmore ecently, a referee's assessor.
But for all that referees get unwarranted abuse as you describe, 99.9% of them are never going to referee under VAR.
And as my pal commented, the 0.1% who do don't like it (he used the term "hate it"), it's just that they cannot come out and say so.

I've now been to a dozen games or so games with VAR. I can tell you now that I've yet to find any single supporter, home or away, who think it a good thing. Which is why we uniformly express our displeasure by booing etc, as fans are won't to do.

As for your "choice" (take it or leave), why should we be forced into either?

VAR is for the professional game only, and the elite level of the professional game at that.

And it should never be forgotten that ultimately, the only thing which distinguishes pro football from the amateur version played by millions of people all over the world is that the former is supported (literally and figuratively) by the thousands who pay good money every week to watch the games.

And you would effectively tell us to piss off if we don't like what we're getting?

Would you tell that to the players, pundits, managers and (ahem) referees who don't like it either? Confused

There is no alternative to VAR. Once it's in the game, it stays in. I didn't tell anyone to pis off, I told them they have a choice. They either go to games and live with the new reality of watching games, or they're free to go and do something else. Either way, it's not changing, and that's that. 

Unfortunately, we don't have VAR here at any level in Ireland, but I look forward to going to them, and if I think a decision needs to be reviewed, I am more than willing to wait for the officials to do their job, it's no problem, I will wait. My message to them is, Give me the correct decision and we'll argue about the optics later. These games often cost 50 quid a head, so I want justice on a football pitch on the spot, not a token investigation opened 3 days later, after the damage has been done and everyone has long since gone home. 

VAR is in operation in leagues in approx 40 countries, most international tournaments, and still growing rapidly. It's already in lower divisions in Germany and Spain, it's in the Euro playoffs next month, and it's in the UEFA Cup next season. It's only gong to expand further, and probably cover more decisions than it does atm. It's mainly but not exclusively at the elite levels atm. But at the rate of expansion, in 10 years or so, I think it will be routine procedure in the professional game.

If any ref is that upset about an assistant to help make his job easier, he is perfectly free to walk away, tell us all why he is doing so, and do something else. That's what one of the top refs did in Europe, Anders Frisk who said he had enough of stick and threats and he walked. To date, no referee has done that because of VAR, so that shows me that most are happy to have someone looking out for them and only stepping in when they absolutely have to. 
VAR: Cutting the crap out of football.
Back to Top
Hans Moleman View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane
Avatar
Muff: That is a lie and you are a liar

Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 10199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hans Moleman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Feb 2020 at 12:00am
You comment as if VAR has corrected every wrong decision in matches since its introduction, yet everybody can see numerous incorrect calls in games every weekend. 

You do realise that VAR is just a human being with technology to assist (technology that isn't anywhere near up to scratch btw)? You realise that the VAR will continue to regularly get decisions wrong as the human beings and technology involved simply aren't up to standard? 


"I called him an embarrassment to FIFA and to himself," .... He said 'No-one speaks to me like that'.... and I said, "well I do' and that was that."
Back to Top
jamie2905 View Drop Down
Kevin Kilbane
Kevin Kilbane
Avatar

Joined: 06 Oct 2017
Location: Lapland
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamie2905 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Feb 2020 at 9:56am
Just incredible how long this discussion is going on for.

The fact is VAR has got significantly more decisions right than it has got wrong, therefore it stays.
As of 13th January, VAR had 97.9% decisions correct. 

Although I could argue with how it is being used (not looking at monitors, VAR being under qualified, and tech not being quite good enough for marginal offsides) it is much better than nothing at all.

Once again, 97.9%.
Back to Top
Hans Moleman View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane
Avatar
Muff: That is a lie and you are a liar

Joined: 09 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 10199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hans Moleman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Feb 2020 at 10:12am
Originally posted by jamie2905 jamie2905 wrote:

Just incredible how long this discussion is going on for.

The fact is VAR has got significantly more decisions right than it has got wrong, therefore it stays.
As of 13th January, VAR had 97.9% decisions correct. 

Although I could argue with how it is being used (not looking at monitors, VAR being under qualified, and tech not being quite good enough for marginal offsides) it is much better than nothing at all.

Once again, 97.9%.

I love those 99.99765 percent correct stats LOL I wonder who releases those figures to the public?
"I called him an embarrassment to FIFA and to himself," .... He said 'No-one speaks to me like that'.... and I said, "well I do' and that was that."
Back to Top
jamie2905 View Drop Down
Kevin Kilbane
Kevin Kilbane
Avatar

Joined: 06 Oct 2017
Location: Lapland
Status: Offline
Points: 161
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamie2905 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Feb 2020 at 10:24am
Originally posted by Hans Moleman Hans Moleman wrote:

Originally posted by jamie2905 jamie2905 wrote:

Just incredible how long this discussion is going on for.

The fact is VAR has got significantly more decisions right than it has got wrong, therefore it stays.
As of 13th January, VAR had 97.9% decisions correct. 

Although I could argue with how it is being used (not looking at monitors, VAR being under qualified, and tech not being quite good enough for marginal offsides) it is much better than nothing at all.

Once again, 97.9%.

I love those 99.99765 percent correct stats LOL I wonder who releases those figures to the public?

Well thank Christ you aren't making the decisions, clearly can't read very well.
97.9. Not 99.99765.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5152535455 72>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.00
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.