U.S Politics

planning wrote:

heighway2heaven wrote:

Had to swing by this thread again to see if there'd been any answer

The Democratic Party are full of lefties liberals and socialists, take your pick. How they fund themselves is up to them.

Troll or space cadet, take your pick.

http://giant.gfycat.com/LimpLittleArabianoryx.gif

https://mobile.twitter.com/sunny_hundal/status/944158714835107840

Caught out big time

Edited by Denis Irwin - 22 Dec 2017 at 12:02pm

Eamonn Dunphy:"I'll tell you who wrote it, Rod Liddle, he's the guy who ran away and left his wife for a young one".

Bill O'Herlihy: Ah ye can't be saying that now Eamonn

The greatest WUM on the planet Clap

(he probably doesn't believe in global warming, but he knows well how to get a reaction out of people)

I agree with him. Global warming is a load of nonsense.

l hear you are a racist now, father ?

bhob wrote:

BabbsBalls wrote:

I agree with him. Global warming is a load of nonsense.

You can't be for real?

Yes. A load of ‘ol cobblers if you ask me young bob.

l hear you are a racist now, father ?

irishmufc wrote:

BabbsBalls wrote:

I agree with him. Global warming is a load of nonsense.

Is the earth flat too Babbs?

Excellent comparison bud.

People were told the earth was flat and the majority believed it. Similar to global warming today. Now carry on doing what your told and go away

l hear you are a racist now, father ?

Thanks Bhob

Straight away I would query the fact that that study is based solely on records since 1880. Do you not think that’s conveniently leaving out a significant portion of time since year dot (which a lot of these studies conveniently do) ?

Scientists can quite accurately estimate temperatures during the Ice age . If that’s the case why do a lot of the studies on global warming focus on temperatures in the last 150 years ? Obviuosly to show the impact of the Industrial Age but it’s ignoring the fact that there have been subtle and extreme rises and falls in temperature long before machines were created or aerosols were sprayed !!!

Nonsense Bill !!

Edited by BabbsBalls - 29 Dec 2017 at 1:19pm

l hear you are a racist now, father ?

Put the phone down and go outside you. There’s a world outside of ybig and the Internet, there’s plenty of good things to see off screen

l hear you are a racist now, father ?

BabbsBalls wrote:

Thanks Bhob

Straight away I would query the fact that that study is based solely on records since 1880. Do you not think that’s conveniently leaving out a significant portion of time since year dot (which a lot of these studies conveniently do) ?

Scientists can quite accurately estimate temperatures during the Ice age . If that’s the case why do a lot of the studies on global warming focus on temperatures in the last 150 years ? Obviuosly to show the impact of the Industrial Age but it’s ignoring the fact that there have been subtle and extreme rises and falls in temperature long before machines were created or aerosols were sprayed !!!

Nonsense Bill !!

The studies being based on records since the 1880s can be explained by the fact that the records simply may not have been there, or of such poor quality they would add little to the studies.

You are correct when you say there is interest in studying the effects of the industrial age, but implying that the studies are baseless because they apparently ignore previous climatic patterns is ridiculous. It's a well known fact among climatology that the planet goes through periods of warming and cooling. The reason why these studies focus on anthropogenic activity is that climatologists want to know to what extent are humans influencing climate change; to give you an example, global mean sea level has risen at a rate of about 1.7mm/year over the last two centuries, however, between 1993 and 2014, that rate accelerated to 3.2mm/yr. 87% of the observed change in sea level since 1970 has been due to human activity.

Tír gan teanga, tír gan anam