Stephen Kenny Poll - In or Out |
Post Reply | Page <1 567 |
Author | |||
Strazdas
Jack Charlton Joined: 17 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5485 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Any manager could have done that. Phase out older players, throw in a few under 21s, manage team through transitional period. Where's the 'achievement' in that? That seems an incredibly low bar to set for the national team.
|
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
Neil Armstrong
Jack Charlton Cyavan Cyunt Joined: 17 Jun 2010 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 5003 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
its a In for me
|
|||
Ulster Champions 2020 our 40th Title. Take that all ye Moanaghan ***ts!
|
|||
BriMurt
Kevin Kilbane Joined: 14 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 312 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
As I said, expectations take a while to settle alongside the performance of the team. In an extreme case, it took the English public 40+ years to really accept they probably weren't able to win a world cup and just be satisfied with getting to the quarters or semis, and actually make the required improvements in their domestic system to one day make a team that would be capable of winning said tournament. To people who have been keenly watching the Ireland team, the Luxembourg result isn't that great of a surprise, but it's a bit of a shock to the wider public, and the press have been going to town on Kenny over it. It may take a couple of campaigns of sh*te before everyone really accepts where the team is at and lays off the manager to let them try and rebuild.
|
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Apologies for intruding on private grief etc, but that's not quite true. For one thing, we played reasonably well in the majority of games during Michael's first two years, we just couldn't get wins. And whilst there was indeed more than our share of shyte in the years before Michael took over, there were also some great nights too eg beating England, Spain, Denmark and Sweden; Healy breaking the record for goals in a European qualifying campaign (13 in 12 games); and Sanchez taking us from #103 in the FIFA Rankings to #32 in just 3 years. Anyhow while it is tempting to compare MO'N with SK due to the similarity in age, background and experience etc, imo it is a little too simplistic. For while everyone draws bits from the experiences they've had previously, ultimately every manager has to be his own man and trust that that is good enough. As for whether SK will be good enough, I have no idea. But I will allow one comparison, namely that even had they wanted, the IFA probably didn't have the money to sack Michael early on. And I'd say the FAI certainly can't afford to sack SK now.
|
|||
Fruice
Liam Brady Joined: 22 Nov 2014 Location: Cork Status: Offline Points: 1261 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The comparison between o Neill and Kenny has been made for a while now but there is always the possibility that O Neill is A better manager than Kenny. Kenny will get the rest of the campaign with us but if can achieve what O Neill did with Northern Ireland Kenny would have to go down as one of our best managers ever. For this to happen it would be one of the most glorious turn arounds in Irish sporting history.
|
|||
Stoked Up
Jack Charlton Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Location: España Status: Offline Points: 6674 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
In, no question. Judge after the end of the campaign.
|
|||
planning
Ray Houghton Football version of Comical Ali. Joined: 17 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 3836 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So he was sacked at Dunfermline, after reaching a cup final. What trees have they pulled up since? He has always found high demanding high expectations jobs a struggle. That's what he had to do at Rovers, and he didn't win despite having the best players in the league at the time. Now he's in a job with similiar demands and expectations, and that's not going to plan either. The only difference is the playing pool is much weaker than previous Irish teams, let alone the rest of the world. This is a transitional phase. So the focus for this campaign, possibly the next should be on players/performances over results, rather than the other way round. It's not to take pressure off him, it's to give him the time to do the job that has to be done, and is long overdue. Every nation has a transitional period at some point. We've preferred to kick the can down the road instead. Now we have to go through it, and if the price is a loss at home to Luxembourg, that is the price that has to be paid. A couple of years ago, we were losing to Serbia and 5-1 at home in qualifiers. And the coach was kept on for another 12 months. Unfortunately, his results are going to be compared to those in the job before him, with no context. We've tried changing managers before, we've had 3 men in charge in 3 years. The results of that short term policy are now staring us in the face. The last time we sacked a man when we were bottom of a group after he lost his first two games of a campaign, we didn't qualify for a tournament for the next 10 years. It is heartbreaking seeing us bottom of the group, below the Georgias and the Luxembourgs of the game, and down with the San Marinos and Gibraltar positions in groups, but we haven't got into this state overnight, it's been coming for a long time, and there is absolutely nothing to suggest that another change now would have us packing our bags for Doha next year. People now demand qualification or the sack, a black or white basis. But we've reached 2 tournaments in 25 years. They need to wake up.
|
|||
Jimmy Raggatip
500 Club la la la Joined: 28 May 2018 Status: Offline Points: 727 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I don't see the problem with it, giving younger players experience to have a good crack at euro 2024, the achievement comes from these players becoming senior level regulars and building a core for the seniors that could last a decade plus. The achievement comes in sitting down and coming up with a long term plan and seeing that plan come to fruition its defeatist to almost give up on a 2-year cycle but its also pragmatic to target the Euros where the top 2 qualify automatically and 3rd gets a playoff, rather than wetting ourselves when we don't qualify for a World Cup that we were a long shot to get to anyway
|
|||
tetsujin1979
Ray Houghton Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Status: Offline Points: 4117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But then, I'm a glass half full kind of person
|
|||
Left foot
Ray Houghton Joined: 16 Aug 2019 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But then further. 50% of the tournaments we qualified for were embarrassing and we were the first team home with a single goal to our name.
|
|||
Zinedine Kilbane 110
Jack Charlton Man City records obsession Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Location: Dundalk Status: Offline Points: 9647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
In the last 25 years we qualified for 3 tournaments 2002 WC 2012 EC 2016 EC But Europe only gets 13/14 WC places. We will never qualify for another 32 team World Cup. We will need them to open it up to 64 teams to have a chance. We are at best 18-24 team in Europe.. I say at best as now we are probably 25-30th in Europe and some lux fans may disagree. The aim should be to qualify for the EC every 4 years now that it is 24 teams.
|
|||
|
|||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10660 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The difficulty is, its a convenient example, which is close to home, and relatively comparable in terms of managerial record. MON also prepared, Irish fans, mentally, for the employment of a manger whose experience came from the LOI. MON basically achieved as much (on paper) as Martin O'Neill (you could debate the detail) with an ostensibly weaker group of players, and this can create a mentality that replication is possible. My question is, when do you call time on an experiment that is clearly failing, and blindly following the mantra that it worked for Northern Ireland means it will work for us. Like I said on the match thread, if there are political matters at issue in the camp, this will weaken the relationship between players and management, which wasn't a problem with Michael O'Neill. And these could range from an arrogance amongst some players towards a manager who earned his stripes outside of England, the issues related to Robbie Keane, and indeed any fall out which has continued in the aftermath of the Wembley debacle. If these are actual issues in the camp, that will make SK's task a lot more difficult, as its no longer just about finding the right formation and the right players. I think its a complex enough situation, with multiple factors that to just point to NI's success after a rocky start (results wise) could be to whistle past the graveyard. I very strongly believe in keeping Kenny. But I also agree that his position is less robust than it was prior to the England game.
|
|||
Shedite
Jack Charlton Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Status: Offline Points: 9820 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
80% of fans wanting him to stay with no realistic alternative mooted.
He's safe for now
|
|||
rebelbrowser
500 Club la la la Joined: 09 Jun 2016 Location: Cork Status: Offline Points: 611 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I read a few papers yesterday and was surprised at the even handed nature of the articles. In the Examiner there were four different opinion pieces on Kenny and all essentially suggested he should be kept on. So all in all I think the press are being very fair on SK.
|
|||
Left foot
Ray Houghton Joined: 16 Aug 2019 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If the main stream media are sympathetic to kennys position you can be sure he's got a difficult.task in front of him. If you had a Roy Keane, Duff, Mcgrath or even mcateer in the team you could say he's not up to the job on current results. We simply don't have a stand out player across the whole team and some of the players we have in the squad should still be in the u21s in an ideal world.
|
|||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10660 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The "should we give up football" thread touches on a number of key points. The fact that we are heavily reliant on players who aren't ready, aren't up to the job, or past their sell-by date means that none of the organs of the football production are functioning at the level or rate they need to be. It will be interesting to see the condition of Welsh football once it evolves beyond Bale, Ramsey, Allen, and in a longer term sense James, Williams, Rodon Brooks and Ampadu. Either they will leverage this (it has also helped I'm sure in the last decade that Cardiff and Swansea are now solid Championship clubs with PL experience under their belt), or rest on their laurels and return to how they performed between 1995 and 2010.
|
|||
Fruice
Liam Brady Joined: 22 Nov 2014 Location: Cork Status: Offline Points: 1261 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Kenny’s biggest test now is not the way he approach’s the games but is get the morale up amongst the players if he can’t do this his job becomes twice as hard.
He has decided for the most part that experience counts for little that leaves him with very little leaders as the experienced guys will be pissed off with him. When they go to Spain they should have a couple of good nights out help build a bond make lads look forward to coming to playing with Ireland. Obviously there is a huge amount of work must go into this camp but they don’t have to go big Jack levels of craic but find some balance |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 567 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |