Spurs to demolish...... |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Vivakenbarlow
Roy Keane Joined: 12 May 2009 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 11892 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 13 Jan 2011 at 7:10am |
Olympic stadium and build a new 60k seater on the site if their bid is succesful
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12173663 This makes absolutely no sense |
|
It took City 44 years to win the league and 10 months to lose it
|
|
Sponsored Links | |
Stoked Up
Jack Charlton Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Location: España Status: Offline Points: 6674 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I see West Ham are proposing something similar should they win the bid too.
Surely some London club would be happy with the stadium as it was intended or just with the removal of the running track as Man City did when they inherited the Commonwealth games stadium? ETA: Just re-read the article. The big difference between the Olympic stadium and the Manchester stadium is the capacity at the London one would have to reduced, whereas City expanded theirs by removing the running track. Neither West Ham nor Spurs would need an 80,000 seater stadium. Edited by Stoked Up - 13 Jan 2011 at 7:41am |
|
colemanY2K
Roy Keane Fresh minty breath Joined: 01 Mar 2010 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 14959 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
west ham intend to keep the running track therefore the athletics gang are happy with their proposal
|
|
"One of the dominant facts in English life during the past three quarters of a century has been the decay of ability in the ruling class." Orwell, 1942.
|
|
Stoked Up
Jack Charlton Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Location: España Status: Offline Points: 6674 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I suppose the danger is the stadium going the same way as China's Birds nest Olympic stadium which is now used as a winter theme park or for the odd concert.
|
|
AntrimMan
Jack Charlton YBIG's resident Nordy/London Hipster Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Christmas Island Status: Online Points: 9454 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The London Olympic stadium is meant to be a semi permanent structure - the top tiers are essestinal temporary and come down to leave a 25 odd thousand stadium ( think its roughly that size anyway). Doesn't seem that suitable either way for either party.
|
|
@AntrimMan85
|
|
Justice No. 1
Ray Houghton Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Status: Offline Points: 4029 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
West Ham should get this as the stadium is in East London where they're from. Spurs has planning permission to build a stadium next door to their current one in north london. While both areas are kips most Spurs fans I've spoken to would prefer to remain a north london club. |
|
Vivakenbarlow
Roy Keane Joined: 12 May 2009 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 11892 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If i was living in england paying tax towards an 80k seater olympic stadium in the height of a recession i wouldnt be too happy with spurs knocking it down straight after the games
|
|
It took City 44 years to win the league and 10 months to lose it
|
|
seaniemac
Jack Charlton Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Location: London Status: Offline Points: 6245 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Think Spurs are just using it to force Haringey Council into a better deal on building a new ground beside WHL.
|
|
ScruffyR
Liam Brady Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 1230 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Stupid decision if it go's ahead
|
|
"Football isn't a matter of life or death, it's much more important than that."
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |