Print Page | Close Window

Who should be number one striker

Printed From: You Boys in Green
Category: International
Forum Name: Republic Of Ireland
Forum Description: All ROI International Team forums
URL: https://forum.ybig.ie/forum_posts.asp?TID=55050
Printed Date: 28 Apr 2024 at 1:14am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.00 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Who should be number one striker
Posted By: Stickittotheman
Subject: Who should be number one striker
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:24am
As well all know we have a dearth of strikers at the minute. I see many people suggesting the likes of Scott Hogan etc as solutions but so far he has shown no intention of declaring for us. Long seems better off the bench than starting for me or is it that the lack of options is so bad he is an automatic pick? Walters was excellent against Austria. Should he move up top from out wide. Daryl Murphy has been picked for some massive games, i.e Bosnia and Germany. Scored a huge goal vs Serbia to. Or is a left field choice like McGoldrick, Stokes, Rooney or Sheridan worth a go? Kevin Doyle is surely finished at international level or are there others who disagree? McClean has been used up top and done ok- could he be a different choice with Brady moved to left midfield?

-------------
Walters coming back from an offside position but Shane Long was definitely onside- Shane Lonnggggggg.... has done it!!!!



Replies:
Posted By: lassassinblanc
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:34am
Long is probably our most dangerous striker, I agree perhaps off the bench he is more effective, Walters is wasted out on the right wing imo so perhaps he should be our number 9, Long in behind him, akin to Quinn/Keane combo


Posted By: horsebox
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:40am
Long.
We have no one else.

Walters is 34 in a few months, Murphy is a similar age too.

Grim future ahead.

-------------
It was far across the sea,
When the devil got a hold of me,
He wouldn't set me free,
So he kept me soul for ransom.
na na na na na na na na na
na na na na na na na na.
I'm a sailor man from Glasgow to


Posted By: Devrozex
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:43am
Walters, Long and Murphy are all well ahead of the other options. Walters has led the line reasonably effectively for Stoke a few times this season but think MON prefers him out on the right. If that preference continues then Long is the default No. 1. Murphy offers us another option but Long is the better all round player, despite his inherent streakiness. I'd also imagine of those three he's the one that opposition centre halves would least like to play against.


Posted By: OnTheOneRoad
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 11:46am
Two people voted for the Elvis basher fair play lads

I do think it should be walters. Long is most effective from the bench

-------------
No thank you Turkish......I'm sweet enough


Posted By: Claret Murph
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 12:48pm
Has to be Long .

-------------
Lansdowne Road debut aged 52 and 201 days .


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 12:49pm
All day Long........Walters not quick enough to get in behind like Shane.  Pretty stark options alright.

-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: grannyrule
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 1:17pm
Walters with Long off the bench

-------------
The only way is up


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 1:17pm
I think we should start thinking about a false 9............

-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: SByrne24
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 1:19pm
This isn't even a debate is it? 

Shane Long is our main man backed up by Johnny Walters.

We need Hogan to come off the bench at the 70th minute or so and drive at the bloody goal. The fact we've tried James McClean as a striker a few times now.. is worrying.

Stokes has two votes ClapLOL


-------------
YBIG Resident Pilot


Posted By: Eamon Numpty
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 1:25pm
Long is a good impact sub. Not good when he starts imo.

Why is there no option for Connor Sammon?

-------------
''If you have passion, if you have conviction, if you believe the lies that you're writing , then you stand to make a great deal of money. Its a beautiful game. Thats why I love writing for the Star."


Posted By: lassassinblanc
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:08pm
Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

I think we should start thinking about a false 9............


Who do we have to play that role though?


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:18pm
Originally posted by lassassinblanc lassassinblanc wrote:

Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

I think we should start thinking about a false 9............


Who do we have to play that role though?
Sarcasm.


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: lassassinblanc
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:21pm
Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

Originally posted by lassassinblanc lassassinblanc wrote:

Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

I think we should start thinking about a false 9............


Who do we have to play that role though?
Sarcasm.


Who does he play for call him up I say


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:23pm
Sammon?  FFS, you may as well call up Cascarino.

-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: FrankosHereNow
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:25pm
Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

I think we should start thinking about a false 9............
Khalid Boulahrouz squad number at Chelsea was 9. An excellent false 9.

-------------
YBIG Quiz Champion 2016, 2017 & 2018.

As You Were
Three in a row


Posted By: grannyrule
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:33pm
Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

Sammon?  FFS, you may as well call up Cascarino.

Sammon and Keogh up front with Paul Green playing just behind them.Wink


-------------
The only way is up


Posted By: Cabra Hoop
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 2:51pm
Cathal Muckian

-------------
" BFC always gives me a laugh........ "


Posted By: TonyNotJack
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 3:10pm
Didn't know Kevin Doyle's mam was on the forum. Hello mrs Doyle.


Posted By: grannyrule
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 3:13pm
Originally posted by TonyNotJack TonyNotJack wrote:

Didn't know Kevin Doyle's mam was on the forum. Hello mrs Doyle.


Anthony Stokes parents are obviously here too.


-------------
The only way is up


Posted By: deise316
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:08pm
I actually think MON believes Murphy is his main striker (and he isn't even in the poll............) and Long is his first choice sub. 

Injuries have prevented us from finding out if that theory is right, but looking at all those crosses going in from Hayes, Horgan & Brady last night, Long is an excellent header of the ball who tries to time jumps, take a step away from the CB to make a bit of space & place headers where the keeper cant get to it, but everything has to be perfect for that to happen, the cross, the run, the timing of the jump etc. 

Murphy will just go up there anyway, directly take on the CB, won't really give a damn what the defender is doing and even if he doesn't win the ball, the defender probably won't either. It won't look anything near as pretty, but it can be as effective. 

I said in the match thread last night that I thought the players who had their reputations enhanced the most last night (and throw in the Wales game as well) were Hoolahan & Murphy. For Long's biggest strength (his pace) to be utilised, you need either something of an accurate or lucky long ball, or a defence splitting pass at the right time. Whatever about the first option, the 2nd one is seemingly only something Hoolahan is capable of doing on a regular basis. 

He also seems to link up well with Long, as in the 2 seem to have a good understanding, Wes where Long will run to & the type of run he makes, Long for anticipation as to where Wes will put the ball.  Long doesn't look as effective for us without Hoolahan. 

Murphy is a whole other option, completely different player and not much movement, nearly none at all in comparison to Long. But lump enough crosses or long high balls at him & one or 2 will stick, and closer to goal, he will simply bully defenders rather than try anything too clever. But you don't need Hoolahan for Murphy to be effective, you only need a few decent crosses or long balls, we have been doing that forever as a team, and I think this factor will come in to MONs thinking in future games, provided Murphy is fit for them. 








-------------
Picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.....


Posted By: Green Devil
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:38pm
Shane Long by a country mile.

On a side note, Jon Walters shouldn't be used on the wing anymore. He hasn't the guile nor the legs to do so.

-------------
"He drives two Ferraris; I think he's a very lucky lad to have 50 caps for Ireland,"

Eamonn Dunphy on Glenn Whelan


Posted By: BlackKat
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:38pm
Honestly should be Long > Murphy > Walters > Sheridan  in that order



Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 10:45pm
Originally posted by deise316 deise316 wrote:

I actually think MON believes Murphy is his main striker (and he isn't even in the poll............) and Long is his first choice sub. 

Injuries have prevented us from finding out if that theory is right, but looking at all those crosses going in from Hayes, Horgan & Brady last night, Long is an excellent header of the ball who tries to time jumps, take a step away from the CB to make a bit of space & place headers where the keeper cant get to it, but everything has to be perfect for that to happen, the cross, the run, the timing of the jump etc. 

Murphy will just go up there anyway, directly take on the CB, won't really give a damn what the defender is doing and even if he doesn't win the ball, the defender probably won't either. It won't look anything near as pretty, but it can be as effective. 

I said in the match thread last night that I thought the players who had their reputations enhanced the most last night (and throw in the Wales game as well) were Hoolahan & Murphy. For Long's biggest strength (his pace) to be utilised, you need either something of an accurate or lucky long ball, or a defence splitting pass at the right time. Whatever about the first option, the 2nd one is seemingly only something Hoolahan is capable of doing on a regular basis. 

He also seems to link up well with Long, as in the 2 seem to have a good understanding, Wes where Long will run to & the type of run he makes, Long for anticipation as to where Wes will put the ball.  Long doesn't look as effective for us without Hoolahan. 

Murphy is a whole other option, completely different player and not much movement, nearly none at all in comparison to Long. But lump enough crosses or long high balls at him & one or 2 will stick, and closer to goal, he will simply bully defenders rather than try anything too clever. But you don't need Hoolahan for Murphy to be effective, you only need a few decent crosses or long balls, we have been doing that forever as a team, and I think this factor will come in to MONs thinking in future games, provided Murphy is fit for them. 






I agree that Murphy has become his first choice  and it is perfectly understandable. He doesn't have Walters work rate or Long's mobility but his positioning in the box for crosses is far and away the best we have and is probably the best finisher we have too, hardly a ringing endorsement! When you watch him play he is always either getting his head on a cross or very close,compare that with the last fifteen minutes on Friday.
 He is also the best target man of the three because he doesn't move, you don't have to look up to know where Murphy is! He must be given huge credit on how he is worked at his game over the past year, I didn't want him near the squad 12 months back.


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 11:30pm
How is Sheridan even getting a mention? Grand lad, honest as fook but only difference between him and Sammon is we can't pun Sheridan as well as Sammon.

-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 29 Mar 2017 at 11:32pm
Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

How is Sheridan even getting a mention? Grand lad, honest as fook but only difference between him and Sammon is we can't pun Sheridan as well as Sammon.
Because after Long,Murphy and Walters are options are all grand honest lads who aren't very good!


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: Stickittotheman
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 9:11am
Originally posted by deise316 deise316 wrote:

I actually think MON believes Murphy is his main striker (and he isn't even in the poll............) and Long is his first choice sub. 

Injuries have prevented us from finding out if that theory is right, but looking at all those crosses going in from Hayes, Horgan & Brady last night, Long is an excellent header of the ball who tries to time jumps, take a step away from the CB to make a bit of space & place headers where the keeper cant get to it, but everything has to be perfect for that to happen, the cross, the run, the timing of the jump etc. 

Murphy will just go up there anyway, directly take on the CB, won't really give a damn what the defender is doing and even if he doesn't win the ball, the defender probably won't either. It won't look anything near as pretty, but it can be as effective. 

I said in the match thread last night that I thought the players who had their reputations enhanced the most last night (and throw in the Wales game as well) were Hoolahan & Murphy. For Long's biggest strength (his pace) to be utilised, you need either something of an accurate or lucky long ball, or a defence splitting pass at the right time. Whatever about the first option, the 2nd one is seemingly only something Hoolahan is capable of doing on a regular basis. 

He also seems to link up well with Long, as in the 2 seem to have a good understanding, Wes where Long will run to & the type of run he makes, Long for anticipation as to where Wes will put the ball.  Long doesn't look as effective for us without Hoolahan. 

Murphy is a whole other option, completely different player and not much movement, nearly none at all in comparison to Long. But lump enough crosses or long high balls at him & one or 2 will stick, and closer to goal, he will simply bully defenders rather than try anything too clever. But you don't need Hoolahan for Murphy to be effective, you only need a few decent crosses or long balls, we have been doing that forever as a team, and I think this factor will come in to MONs thinking in future games, provided Murphy is fit for them. 






 
 
 
EmbarrassedEmbarrassedEmbarrassedEmbarrassed I thought I put him in EmbarrassedEmbarrassed


-------------
Walters coming back from an offside position but Shane Long was definitely onside- Shane Lonnggggggg.... has done it!!!!


Posted By: Roberto Baggio
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 9:14am
Did it really take Tuesday night to prove to some people that Kevin Doyle is done?
 
He's been gone for the last 4 or 5 years


Posted By: Lenny82
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 9:29am
Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

How is Sheridan even getting a mention? Grand lad, honest as fook but only difference between him and Sammon is we can't pun Sheridan as well as Sammon.
Because after Long,Murphy and Walters are options are all grand honest lads who aren't very good!
 
*our Wink


Posted By: Zinedine Kilbane 110
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 9:44am
We only have 

Long (31 in Jan 2018)
Walters (34 in Sept 2017)
Murphy (35 in March 2018)

in that order.

We are fine for this WC campaign but in 2 years time we will have a massive gap up front.

The question should be who is likely going to fill that gap.


-------------



Posted By: The White Cafu
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 11:24am
I think Long is definitely a better player but I actually prefer to see Murphy starting and Long coming off the bench, Long never seems to play aswell starting for us as he does coming off the bench, and can destroy tired defenders with his pace coming on around the 60 minute mark


Posted By: Roberto Baggio
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 11:35am
Its a bit of a conundrum because Murphy doesn't exactly bang the goals in for us, is it 1 goal in 20+ starts?
But he is effective enough in some games in the game plan that we play
 


Posted By: djhegzy
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 12:00pm
I would like to see Murphy with long to come on. however if Walters has to play every game for some reason, I would rather he started up front as brings nothing playing out wide.


Posted By: Lenny82
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 12:16pm
I said it in another thread but I think Robbie Brady could solve our short to medium term problem as a striker. Not the biggest fella in the world but neither was Robbie Keane.
 
We need to forget about these long balls forward to a big man and half the time I think having a big man up front makes it an easy decision for a defender to lump it long whereas with a smaller guy, we may need to take a more sensible approach and keep it on the deck.
 
Also means we can accommodate Ward, McClean and Brady v Austria.


Posted By: MC Hammered
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 12:26pm
Originally posted by Lenny82 Lenny82 wrote:

I said it in another thread but I think Robbie Brady could solve our short to medium term problem as a striker. Not the biggest fella in the world but neither was Robbie Keane.
 
We need to forget about these long balls forward to a big man and half the time I think having a big man up front makes it an easy decision for a defender to lump it long whereas with a smaller guy, we may need to take a more sensible approach and keep it on the deck.
 
Also means we can accommodate Ward, McClean and Brady v Austria.

Jaysis. That is a fairly mental suggestion. 


-------------
El Puto Amo


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 12:35pm
Originally posted by MC Hammered MC Hammered wrote:

Originally posted by Lenny82 Lenny82 wrote:


I said it in another thread but I think Robbie Brady could solve our short to medium term problem as a striker. Not the biggest fella in the world but neither was Robbie Keane.
 
We need to forget about these long balls forward to a big man and half the time I think having a big man up front makes it an easy decision for a defender to lump it long whereas with a smaller guy, we may need to take a more sensible approach and keep it on the deck.
 
Also means we can accommodate Ward, McClean and Brady v Austria.



Jaysis. That is a fairly mental suggestion. 
not sure it is. Has played as 10 for Norwich. Finds good space and an excellent finisher. Never in a MON team though. Same way seanie maguire has zero chance of playing in a central position.

-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: MC Hammered
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 12:46pm
Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

Originally posted by MC Hammered MC Hammered wrote:

Originally posted by Lenny82 Lenny82 wrote:


I said it in another thread but I think Robbie Brady could solve our short to medium term problem as a striker. Not the biggest fella in the world but neither was Robbie Keane.
 
We need to forget about these long balls forward to a big man and half the time I think having a big man up front makes it an easy decision for a defender to lump it long whereas with a smaller guy, we may need to take a more sensible approach and keep it on the deck.
 
Also means we can accommodate Ward, McClean and Brady v Austria.



Jaysis. That is a fairly mental suggestion. 
not sure it is. Has played as 10 for Norwich. Finds good space and an excellent finisher. Never in a MON team though. Same way seanie maguire has zero chance of playing in a central position.

Woah Woah woah. There's a big difference playing as a number 10 as the most advanced midfielder of a central 3 and playing as a striker. I can see Robbie playing in a central role as Wes does and as he himself has done for us previously. I do not see him as a central striker unless we are going down the false 9 route (which we absolutely will not be doing any time soon)
 


-------------
El Puto Amo


Posted By: Steve Amsterdam
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 1:02pm
Originally posted by lassassinblanc lassassinblanc wrote:

Long is probably our most dangerous striker, I agree perhaps off the bench he is more effective, Walters is wasted out on the right wing imo so perhaps he should be our number 9, Long in behind him, akin to Quinn/Keane combo

My exact sentiments. Use the speed of Long while he still has it, and use the size of Walters.


-------------
Molly Malone's pub- The home of YBIG in Amsterdam!


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 1:06pm
Originally posted by deise316 deise316 wrote:

I actually think MON believes Murphy is his main striker (and he isn't even in the poll............) and Long is his first choice sub. 

Given our propensity for mostly long ball hoofs, why not?

Has McClean been tried as the main striker yet?
Given the age of our current batch and with no likely candidates coming through playing at higher levels, we will be back to the good old days of make shift strikers. It's not so long that Brian Kerr played centre back Gary Doherty as a makeshift striker, although he had some experience of the role at club level.

ETA: When Walters plays as a winger he does an enormous amount of defensive duties. I don't think we'd get the same mileage out of him as the main striker.


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 1:55pm
Originally posted by MC Hammered MC Hammered wrote:

Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

Originally posted by MC Hammered MC Hammered wrote:

Originally posted by Lenny82 Lenny82 wrote:


I said it in another thread but I think Robbie Brady could solve our short to medium term problem as a striker. Not the biggest fella in the world but neither was Robbie Keane.
 
We need to forget about these long balls forward to a big man and half the time I think having a big man up front makes it an easy decision for a defender to lump it long whereas with a smaller guy, we may need to take a more sensible approach and keep it on the deck.
 
Also means we can accommodate Ward, McClean and Brady v Austria.



Jaysis. That is a fairly mental suggestion. 
not sure it is. Has played as 10 for Norwich. Finds good space and an excellent finisher. Never in a MON team though. Same way seanie maguire has zero chance of playing in a central position.

Woah Woah woah. There's a big difference playing as a number 10 as the most advanced midfielder of a central 3 and playing as a striker. I can see Robbie playing in a central role as Wes does and as he himself has done for us previously. I do not see him as a central striker unless we are going down the false 9 route (which we absolutely will not be doing any time soon)
 
And, according to Norwich fans anyway, playing him in that position was the most mental of all Alex Neil's mad decisions and didn't work! Most of them, like me, believe Brady to be a very good winger and, at a push, a decent wing-back, he isn't a central player at all.
I think we could try Westwood there, he plays there in training, is very strong and has a powerful shot.


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: BlackKat
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 3:42pm
Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

How is Sheridan even getting a mention? Grand lad, honest as fook but only difference between him and Sammon is we can't pun Sheridan as well as Sammon.


He's relatively young, tall, and excellent at holding up the ball. Alongside Long I think he'd be a great fit.


Posted By: coyne
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 3:48pm
Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

How is Sheridan even getting a mention? Grand lad, honest as fook but only difference between him and Sammon is we can't pun Sheridan as well as Sammon.

He actually fits the MON criteria of the tall striker / good in the air hold the ball up that's why.
Hence why the likes of Murphy, Walters and Long are preferred, even Doyle fits the criteria hence why he got the nod - 

Seanie Maguire will never be considered as #1 because of that. And neither will any of the more crazy suggestions in the thread. But Sheridan is a fine shout. 


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 3:55pm
Originally posted by coyne coyne wrote:

Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

How is Sheridan even getting a mention? Grand lad, honest as fook but only difference between him and Sammon is we can't pun Sheridan as well as Sammon.

He actually fits the MON criteria of the tall striker / good in the air hold the ball up that's why.
Hence why the likes of Murphy, Walters and Long are preferred, even Doyle fits the criteria hence why he got the nod - 

Seanie Maguire will never be considered as #1 because of that. And neither will any of the more crazy suggestions in the thread. But Sheridan is a fine shout. 
They are preferred as they are our best  three options!


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: valo88
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 4:10pm
Cant believe the amount of people voting for Long, great player, great work man has pace to him.. hassles players all day long but couldnt score in a brothel with a fist full of 50s... Much better off the bench as an impact sub.

Nearly all his goals have come from off the bench for us, at least all his big goals in qualifiers have. When hes started and played 90 he hasnt scored.

Walters for me, give him half a chance and he'll put it away.. Give long the same and he'd fluff it 2/3 times.


Posted By: MC Hammered
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 4:51pm
Originally posted by valo88 valo88 wrote:

Cant believe the amount of people voting for Long, great player, great work man has pace to him.. hassles players all day long but couldnt score in a brothel with a fist full of 50s... Much better off the bench as an impact sub.

Nearly all his goals have come from off the bench for us, at least all his big goals in qualifiers have. When hes started and played 90 he hasnt scored.

Walters for me, give him half a chance and he'll put it away.. Give long the same and he'd fluff it 2/3 times.

Have any of the resident geeks on here got the stats for Longs goals for Ireland off the bench vs when he starts? 


-------------
El Puto Amo


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 5:11pm
He has scored 9 goals from 36 starts  and 8 goals from 37 off the bench. Of his five competitive goals, 4 have been scored when he came off the bench. 2 pens,I think(Slovakia and Norway?) both when on from the start and both in friendly games.
His competitive goals are:

Russia (H) 2010
Poland (H) 2015
Gibraltar (A) 2015
Germany (H) 2015
Moldova (A) 2016


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: Terzino
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 5:11pm
Depends on the tactics.

If we play a lone striker then Long, especially if we are set up to defend and counter.

However if we want to play a more effective longball game then we'll need a partnership up front. That means Daryl Murphy as the target man, and Long as the quick man.


Posted By: MC Hammered
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 5:23pm
Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

He has scored 9 goals  from 36 starts  and 8 from 37 off the bench. Of his five competitive goals, 4 have been scored when he came off the bench.
His competitive goals are:

Russia (H) 2010
Poland (H) 2015
Gibraltar (A) 2015
Germany (H) 2015
Moldova (A) 2016

Interesting. Cheers for that. 


-------------
El Puto Amo


Posted By: MC Hammered
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 5:24pm
Originally posted by Terzino Terzino wrote:

Depends on the tactics.

If we play a lone striker then Long, especially if we are set up to defend and counter.

However if we want to play a more effective longball game then we'll need a partnership up front. That means Daryl Murphy as the target man, and Long as the quick man.

We get absolutely bossed in midfield when we go 4-4-2


-------------
El Puto Amo


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 5:26pm
Originally posted by MC Hammered MC Hammered wrote:

Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

He has scored 9 goals  from 36 starts  and 8 from 37 off the bench. Of his five competitive goals, 4 have been scored when he came off the bench.
His competitive goals are:

Russia (H) 2010
Poland (H) 2015
Gibraltar (A) 2015
Germany (H) 2015
Moldova (A) 2016

Interesting. Cheers for that. 
I just added his penalties, I can't be arsed working out how many of his 36 starts were in competitive games!


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 5:29pm
Originally posted by MC Hammered MC Hammered wrote:

Originally posted by Terzino Terzino wrote:

Depends on the tactics.

If we play a lone striker then Long, especially if we are set up to defend and counter.

However if we want to play a more effective longball game then we'll need a partnership up front. That means Daryl Murphy as the target man, and Long as the quick man.

We get absolutely bossed in midfield when we go 4-4-2
We got bossed in midfield when we play 4-5-1 too! I think there is an argument to be made for Walters and Long up top with the former dropping in to midfield when the opposition have the ball. Let's be honest, if we are starting Hendrick it is essentially 2 in the middle.


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: Terzino
Date Posted: 30 Mar 2017 at 7:22pm
The midfield is a problem generally for us, but at least with a 4-4-2 we can play a more traditional longball game.

There are some remedies to consider. When we don't have the ball Long could drop back into midfield to make a 5.

Alternatively, the answer could be to play with 3 in the middle and use only one out-and-out winger.

Or we could try and turn McClean into a box-to-box centre-midfielder. I know he's a winger, but he has so much energy and likes a tackle that it would be great if he could be converted to play in there.

And I'm not sure about Walters and Long as the combo. This has been the partnership most used so far, Walters on the right but pushes forward and tries to win headers, but I'm not sure it has worked.

Walters is not great as a targetman, and neither of them seem to be on eachothers wavelength.

Murphy has taken a long time to get going for Ireland, but I think he is a better option as a targetman for Long to work off of.


Posted By: shakeyshamrock
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 9:34am
Originally posted by Terzino Terzino wrote:

The midfield is a problem generally for us, but at least with a 4-4-2 we can play a more traditional longball game.

There are some remedies to consider. When we don't have the ball Long could drop back into midfield to make a 5.

Alternatively, the answer could be to play with 3 in the middle and use only one out-and-out winger.

Or we could try and turn McClean into a box-to-box centre-midfielder. I know he's a winger, but he has so much energy and likes a tackle that it would be great if he could be converted to play in there.

And I'm not sure about Walters and Long as the combo. This has been the partnership most used so far, Walters on the right but pushes forward and tries to win headers, but I'm not sure it has worked.

Walters is not great as a targetman, and neither of them seem to be on eachothers wavelength.

Murphy has taken a long time to get going for Ireland, but I think he is a better option as a targetman for Long to work off of.

said it before, but I think a 3-5-2/5-3-2 is the answer with the players we have - we can set that up as a defensive one or a more attacking one.. either way it protects us in midfield and still gives us 2 up front. 

defensive:

GK
O'Shea Duffy Clark
Coleman Ward
McCarthy Whelan
Hendrick
Walters Murphy

(very) attacking:

GK
Coleman Clark Ward
McGeady McClean
McCarthy Arter
Hoolohan
Long Murphy


Posted By: djhegzy
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 11:06am
Originally posted by shakeyshamrock shakeyshamrock wrote:

Originally posted by Terzino Terzino wrote:

The midfield is a problem generally for us, but at least with a 4-4-2 we can play a more traditional longball game.

There are some remedies to consider. When we don't have the ball Long could drop back into midfield to make a 5.

Alternatively, the answer could be to play with 3 in the middle and use only one out-and-out winger.

Or we could try and turn McClean into a box-to-box centre-midfielder. I know he's a winger, but he has so much energy and likes a tackle that it would be great if he could be converted to play in there.

And I'm not sure about Walters and Long as the combo. This has been the partnership most used so far, Walters on the right but pushes forward and tries to win headers, but I'm not sure it has worked.

Walters is not great as a targetman, and neither of them seem to be on eachothers wavelength.

Murphy has taken a long time to get going for Ireland, but I think he is a better option as a targetman for Long to work off of.

said it before, but I think a 3-5-2/5-3-2 is the answer with the players we have - we can set that up as a defensive one or a more attacking one.. either way it protects us in midfield and still gives us 2 up front. 

defensive:

GK
O'Shea Duffy Clark
Coleman Ward
McCarthy Whelan
Hendrick
Walters Murphy

(very) attacking:

GK
Coleman Clark Ward
McGeady McClean
McCarthy Arter
Hoolohan
Long Murphy


We dont have coleman tho.... and brady?

Balanced:

GK
Clark Duffy      Keough
Christie Brady
McCarthy Arter
Hoolohan
  Long Murphy

probably as good a team we could field in that formation, nowhere for mcClean tho


Posted By: shakeyshamrock
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 11:25am
Originally posted by djhegzy djhegzy wrote:

 

We dont have coleman tho.... and brady?

Balanced:

GK
Clark Duffy      Keough
Christie Brady
McCarthy Arter
Hoolohan
  Long Murphy

probably as good a team we could field in that formation, nowhere for mcClean tho

I suppose I was going for if everyone was available - I chose McClean over Brady for the left wingback slot in the attacking formation as I think you'd get more running out of him. 
I like your team too - I still might plump for O'Shea ahead of Keogh but really any 3 of our 4 best centre halves would do a decent job. 
The crucial thing is that it gives us a good attacking trio that will hopefully be close together on the pitch while still keeping the solidity in the middle of the park that we often lack when we push too far forward. I think it could help us to hold on to the ball a bit better too - we'd normally have spare players in positions other teams haven't covered due to the difference in formations.. 


Posted By: Roberto Baggio
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 11:27am
Can't see us playing 3 at the back anytime soon.


Posted By: shakeyshamrock
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 11:30am
Originally posted by Roberto Baggio Roberto Baggio wrote:

Can't see us playing 3 at the back anytime soon.

don't see MON doing it either, but I do think that system would address a lot of the problems the team has - it could, of course, throw up a lot of other ones that I haven't considered!! LOL


Posted By: alihau41
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 11:50am
I'm surprised scott 'hulk' Hogan isn't included on the list considering the amount of f**king airtime he gets on here


Posted By: pre Madonna
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 11:59am
Originally posted by alihau41 alihau41 wrote:

I'm surprised scott 'hulk' Hogan isn't included on the list considering the amount of f**king airtime he gets on here
Airtime being the appropriate word, on many levels.


-------------
Greed has won, big finance has won. Whatever small role elite clubs still play in the local communities from which they grew is dwarfed now by their position as global brands.


Posted By: TonyNotJack
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 1:12pm
Originally posted by pre Madonna pre Madonna wrote:

Originally posted by alihau41 alihau41 wrote:

I'm surprised scott 'hulk' Hogan isn't included on the list considering the amount of f**king airtime he gets on here
Airtime being the appropriate word, on many levels.


LOL


Scotty's thread has recently broken the 1000 replies barrier. A major achievement for someone who's never actually played for us.


Posted By: Terzino
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 4:07pm
Originally posted by shakeyshamrock shakeyshamrock wrote:


said it before, but I think a 3-5-2/5-3-2 is the answer with the players we have - we can set that up as a defensive one or a more attacking one.. either way it protects us in midfield and still gives us 2 up front. 

defensive:

GK
O'Shea Duffy Clark
Coleman Ward
McCarthy Whelan
Hendrick
Walters Murphy

(very) attacking:

GK
Coleman Clark Ward
McGeady McClean
McCarthy Arter
Hoolohan
Long Murphy



It would be interesting to see this in operation. 3-5-2 would definitely allow us to play more of a passing game, and you'd hope that having a playmaker and two centre-forwards would give us a greater attacking threat.

I think a problem with a 3-5-2 though is that once you're put on the back foot, by the opposition, it can be difficult to get yourself out of it. Your wingbacks are hemmed in and you lose your width.

Our tendency to fall back after taking the lead in a game might make a formation like this more of a hinderance than a help.


In anyway, for the most part under O'Neill we have hit it long. I can't see him changing things now, although the next couple of friendlies would be a good opportunity to try a 3-5-2.

But if we are to continue with the longball, then I think a 4-4-2 makes more sense. Currently we are a bit 4-3-3 and a bit 4-5-1, and I don't think it is working for us.


Posted By: DeclanDaly
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 4:47pm
We've never looked better than when playing the diamond with two strikers up top and a playmaker in the hole. In the absence of a primary striker, it gives us to option of playing straight up to a big man to hold up the ball, or play through the middle. After this last round of games, I'm thinking the following for Austria:

               Randolph

    Christie Keogh Clark Ward

               McCarthy
     Brady                McClean
                Hoolahan

          Long      Murphy/Walters



-------------
You asked if I'd be anyone from history, fact or fiction, dead or alive:
I said "I'd be Tony Cascarino, circa 1995"


Posted By: TonyNotJack
Date Posted: 31 Mar 2017 at 5:25pm
Originally posted by DeclanDaly DeclanDaly wrote:

We've never looked better than when playing the diamond with two strikers up top and a playmaker in the hole. In the absence of a primary striker, it gives us to option of playing straight up to a big man to hold up the ball, or play through the middle. After this last round of games, I'm thinking the following for Austria:

               Randolph

    Christie Keogh Clark Ward

               McCarthy
     Brady                McClean
                Hoolahan

          Long      Murphy/Walters


 

Harry banished to the naughty step?


Posted By: The O'Shea
Date Posted: 08 Apr 2017 at 10:56pm
There's been a lot of talk about our striking options recently, and whether or not we'll need to recruit foreign-born attackers in the near future; so I thought I'd compile a list of the strikers currently available to us in the top 4 English divisions, the SPL, and a few select others plying their trade elsewhere.
*(Only those who have made senior appearances included)

EPL:
Shane Long- Southampton, 30 years old.
Jon Walters- Stoke, 33
Courtney Duffus- Everton, 21
Sam Byrne- Everton, 21

Championship:
Daryl Murphy- Newcastle, 34
Anthony Pilkington- Cardiff, 28
David McGoldrick- Ipswich, 29
Anthony Stokes- Blackburn, 28
Joe Mason- Wolves, 25
Leon Best- Ipswich, 30
Reece Grego-Cox- QPR, 20
Frank Mulhern- Huddersfield, 20

League One:
Simon Cox- Southend, 29
Paddy Madden- S****horpe, 27
Aiden O'Brien- Millwall, 23
Dave Mooney- Southend, 32
Conor Wilkinson- Bolton, 22
Rory Gaffney- Bristol Rovers, 27
Billy Clarke- Bradford, 29
Joe Quigley- Gillingham, 20

League Two:
Noel Hunt- Portsmouth, 34
Eoin Doyle- Portsmouth, 29
Gerry McDonagh- Cambridge, 19
Rhys Murphy- Crawley, 26
Padraig Amond- Hartlepool, 28
Liam McAlinden- Exeter, 23
Pat Hoban- Mansfield, 25
Barry Corr- Cambridge, 32
James Collins- Crawley, 26
Rowan Roache- Blackpool, 17

SPL:
Adam Rooney- Aberdeen, 28
Conor Sammon- Kilmarnock, 30
Graham Cummins- St.Johnstone, 29
Dean Ebbe- Inverness, 22

Polish Ekstraklasa:
Cillian Sheridan- Jagiellonia Bialystok, 28

A-League
Andy Keogh- Perth Glory, 30
Roy O'Donovan- Central Coast Mariners, 31

MLS:
Kevin Doyle- Colorado Rapids, 33

All in all, with that list of players (plus a few guys in the LOI like Maguire, McMillan, Fagan, and Akinade that may be options) I reckon we have enough depth to get by for 2, or perhaps even 3 years. It would certainly be beneficial to bring a few of the eligible players on board though, and longer term it will become a necessity if our younger talents like McAuley, Hale, Idah etc. don't make the breakthrough. I'd suggest that Bamford, Jutkiewicz, Keane, and Robinson are all realistic targets. I think Hogan and Wickham would be harder to convince.




-------------
We're decent enough..


Posted By: TonyNotJack
Date Posted: 09 Apr 2017 at 12:19am
At some stage his name will stop being funny, but that moment is not now. Courtney Duffas. Smile



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.00 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net