Or The "Great" War, as Loyal Revisionists would tell you 

But after piecing things together over the last year, mostly from sugar packets, I think the gist of it is as follows:

Meghan thinks a lot of media coverage of her in England has displayed a clear racial bias

And that an unnamed member of the Royal family was saying racist stuff regarding her baby's skin colour

And also that there seemed to be much more emphasis within the House of Windsor/Battenberg/Hohenzollern on protecting somebody strongly suspected of being a child sex abuser, than on protecting Meghan from thinly veiled racism 

So she is tired of the racist bias against her, the favouritism towards his Royal Dryness, and the whole goldfish bowl lifestyle

This has made a load of Brexity, women hating, Empire loving types like Peter Shilton and Pearse O'Meara furious

Is this correct

Meghan seems alright

When I was but a newborn in arms the RA blew up Mountbatten and three other innocents

In Ballyer, graffiti went up "13 dead and not forgotten, 18 Brits went up with Mountbatten"

This was then responded to underneath by some other graffiti on the wall merchant: "Mountbatten was pro-Irish freedom"

This was then scrawled out by the original guy before being reinstated

A game of tit for tat ensured

I would have thought the guy who wrote the original graffiti would have known that 14, not 13 people died as a result of the events of Bloody Sunday

Basic facts, like

To be pedantic, always thought it was "we got 18 and Mountbatten"

Aye and a fat lot of good it did

What was the reason for killing the women and children that were on the boat with him

They were antivaxxers putinists.

I don't think that was the reason

 I am not defending or condemning the killing, I am just putting forward what was common gossip, for want of a better term. A lot of people questioned why that child was on the boat as it did seem odd.

It didn't really seem too odd

Mountbatten was a tourist, there was no reason at all to kill him or those with him

Acts like that set back the cause of a united Ireland hugely

I never heard that rumour before.

AFAIK - IRA intelligence knew there were going to be at least another person on the boat and the operation was sanctioned due to the high profile of the target.

Thus making it a war crime.

 

and right wing extremists fond of gaslighting  

Bizarre post

They could only support Harry financially but not Megan or the child: if you look to Prince Andrews kids, they have not got a state cheque or tax payer funded security.  This seemed to be a big sticking point but there was not a precedent there that says grandkids not in line for the throne should be state supported. 

They then cut him off completely but that was because he stepped back from his role that is funded by tax payer. 

He also admitted and was almost appalled that they suggested she should continue acting as they couldn't afford her, that seems very reasonable to me.

Say what you want about the royals (their support of Andrew for instance) and I do really feel for Megan and the lack of coming her defence in the media from he organization and especially not helping her when she came to them for her mental health but for me Harry has thrown his toys out of the pram when it comes to the finance aspect and has come off like a hurt spoiled brat. 

I'm afraid you come off sounding like a pathetic, simpering peasant. Markle married into a family of bilionaires who accumulated their wealth through the rape and pillaging of Britain's barbaric colonialist enterprises. She wouldn't piss on you if you were fire. Spare your pity for those who deserve it. 

Harry's a notorious racist and bigot, who dressed in Nazi regalia on at least one occasion, called an army colleague the p-word and referred to Arab people as 'rag-heads'.

And yet Markle still married the ****. 

Their spurious 'racism' allegations carry no weight whatsoever.

The entire 'Royal family', paedos and all, deserve nothing more than the fate of the Romonovs.