It's well known that Eveton are the Protestant club in Liverpool, comrade - you only have to look at their colours, they play in blue, like Rangers. 

Liverpool are the socialist team, hence the red colours. 

Everton = Protestant, Unionist

Liverpool = Socialist, Internationalist and the team of choice of Irish Republicans

*Known by the dogs on the street, just like it's known that Gerry Adams personally ordered the killing of Jean McConville.

Everton and Rangers have been almost feeder clubs for each other over the years, and many players have played for both, like Trevor Steven, Gary Stevens, Duncan Ferguson, Michael Ball, Richard Gough, David Weir, Alex Cleland, and indeed managed both, such as Walter Smith. 

Contrast that to the Liverpool-Celtic connection, with Kenny Dalglish, Robbie Keane, Craig Bellamy and Gary Gillespie, and the never to be broken ties which were strengthened following Hillsborough, and reinforced during our superbly contested, but brilliantly sporting, both on and off the pitch, UEFA Cup ties in 1997 and 2003

What you listed are just coincidences, true Celtic and Liverpool have a healthy relationship but Everton are the Irish club - Liverpool FC didn't even exist when the Irish were flocking to Everton-owned Anfield.

Also I don't think many Everton fans would actually care if they were protestant, they're not obsessed with sectarian wank.

18 Brits went up with Mountbatten that day, one for every one of our league titles. 

YNWA - There's only one Paisley. 

» English Premier League Teams

Jim Larkin was a season ticket holder at Anfield  from 1910 to 1936 although he nearly got banned because he let other people use it in 1913.  He always said his proudest day was when he met Elisha Scott for a pre-match pint in 1931. 

Tell that to Newstalk when I won "Sports Master of the Universe" 2007*, demolishing their resident expert, Ciaran Murphy, in the process**. One of the questions in the final was: "What has traditionally been the Protestant football club in the city of Liverpool?***" to which I correctly answered "Everton". 

*I'm not making that up. 

**I don't like boasting, except when I'm drunk, which I am now. 

***This was not one of the questions. 

Everton, as we all know, was founded by an Orangeman. As Liverpool, the club of the people, became more successful over the decades and the Everton fans became increasingly bitter at our success, we satirised their Orange history by calling them "the Lemons", and later, "the bitters". 

Like the word "boycott" (which of course comes from the decision of the local people in Mayo during the Land War to ostracise the cruel, heartless landlord Captain Boycott), these phrases don't come from nowhere. They have a historical basis. 

+1

Anyway WHL is the worst stadium view IMO, far too high up. Stamford Bridge around 2000 was cat also.

As a Godless socialist I am of no religion. 

As far as my understanding of the law is concerned, I don't think I've started, as I'm pretty sure calling a person, group of persons or institution "Protestant" is not a libel. 

If Everton want to sue me anyway, the option remains open to them. 

I find your idea that calling an institution "Protestant" constitutes a libel to be sectarian, by the way, and I hope you'll retract it.

You'll note that I merely called Everton " the Protestant club" in Liverpool. I didn't say they were exclusively Protestant, hence my noting of Mo Johnston playing for them. 

Why stop there? Why not say I'm libelling Liverpool for associating them with socialism? 

Why do you find one libellous and the other not to be? There are plenty of people out there who would find being labelled "socialist" as injurious to their reputation. 

Again you're attaching negative connotations to Protestantism, and I find these connotations to be sectarian. 

Please stop. 

On the contrary, my friend. I'm sharper than shark's teeth. 

You've brought up nothing new there. Try again. 

Don't forget about Lee.

There must be some bait on Sid's hook if Irwin keeps jumping back into the boat after he's been released.

Was more like Upton Park 

 

To be included in the new FIFA game as a tribute to a creative director of the game who passed away in April. I wonder if sh*te camera angle will also be included?

 

http://www.portsmouthfc.co.uk/news/article/pompeys-fratton-park-ground-to-appear-in-fifa-16-2590754.aspx" rel="nofollow - http://www.portsmouthfc.co.uk/news/article/pompeys-fratton-park-ground-to-appear-in-fifa-16-2590754.aspx

 

There's pillars in the stand.

I prefer the old angle at Anfield  from a tv viewer perspective as it was closer and lower angle a la Highbury for e.g.

ffs talk about a non-issue 

An awful lot of needless energy wasted on your digits posting about this when you could put it to better use on a right hand date.

It's the first change of camera angle at Anfield since 1972, when the camera was in the opposite stand. When it is moved at a later date, it could be at ground level, similiar to the Allianz Arena which would be even worse.

 

Cry me a river

 

You mean away teams go to Anfield and actually play defensively and keep it tight? Who'd have thought?! 

Liverpool did make it, and the camera angle hasn't changed.

I wonder if the requirements did.

 

The kick-off of the second half of EVERY SINGLE MATCH at Wembley is to a background of empty seats, because corporate ticket holders are too busy stuffing their faces with food and drink to get back to the game starting.  Why can't Wembley simply move the cameras to the other side, where presumably there wouldn't be as many empty seats at the restart. 

http://www.clubwembley.com/memberships/bobby-moore-club" rel="nofollow - http://www.clubwembley.com/memberships/bobby-moore-club