Print Page | Close Window

Social Welfare.

Printed From: You Boys in Green
Category: Other Forums
Forum Name: Whatever!
Forum Description: Anything else going on
URL: https://forum.ybig.ie/forum_posts.asp?TID=36624
Printed Date: 19 May 2024 at 1:46pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.00 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Social Welfare.
Posted By: Baldrick
Subject: Social Welfare.
Date Posted: 03 Mar 2012 at 11:52pm
Lads what  do you think are the biggest inefficiencies in Social Welfare/Protection in Ireland these days. 

Talking about policy here rather than work practices of staff etc.


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt



Replies:
Posted By: Trapped
Date Posted: 03 Mar 2012 at 11:57pm

There shouldn't be a situation where many people are better off staying on Social Welfare than they would be working. That's why some Irish people will turn their noses up at jobs that some foreigners are only too happy to take up.



-------------
67% points to games ratio at the last Euro's (better than Portugal's)


Posted By: Denis Irwin
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:02am
Originally posted by RoyoftheRavers RoyoftheRavers wrote:

There shouldn't be a situation where many people are better off staying on Social Welfare than they would be working. That's why some Irish people will turn their noses up at jobs that some foreigners are only too happy to take up.

 
 
+1


-------------
Eamonn Dunphy:"I'll tell you who wrote it, Rod Liddle, he's the guy who ran away and left his wife for a young one".

Bill O'Herlihy: Ah ye can't be saying that now Eamonn


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:02am
z


Posted By: BabbsBalls
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:38am
No benefits for the self-employed affects me directly. When work drys up you don't get a cent . If your genuinely out sick you don't get a cent. It's not right ..

-------------
l hear you are a racist now, father ?


Posted By: BabbsBalls
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:39am
Originally posted by Denis Irwin Denis Irwin wrote:

Originally posted by RoyoftheRavers RoyoftheRavers wrote:


There shouldn't be a situation where many people are better off staying on Social Welfare than they would be working. That's why some Irish people will turn their noses up at jobs that some foreigners are only too happy to take up.

 
 

+1


+1

-------------
l hear you are a racist now, father ?


Posted By: Denis Irwin
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:43am
I also think they need to seriously review the fact that there are lads out there that are able to claim the dole despite seemingly not having worked a day in life Confused

-------------
Eamonn Dunphy:"I'll tell you who wrote it, Rod Liddle, he's the guy who ran away and left his wife for a young one".

Bill O'Herlihy: Ah ye can't be saying that now Eamonn


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:45am
Originally posted by BabbsBalls BabbsBalls wrote:

No benefits for the self-employed affects me directly. When work drys up you don't get a cent . If your genuinely out sick you don't get a cent. It's not right ..


Yeah I agree with that, I think that will be sorted but it will have to be financed by the self employed now paying the full stamp for themselves rather than the Class S stamp which is 4 per cent.


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: athlonecelt
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:45am
Ive one huge Gripe. During the Celtic Tiger, Anyone that wanted a job could have a job. I mean anyone. My local estate was being developed and the developer was struggling to get a lad to drive a road sweeper. Obviously, theres many unfortunate souls with special needs, and certain disadvantages and disabilities who werent getting jobs wherever they applied. But. There are thousands and thousand of ****s , who fill courtrooms every day for unsocial sh*te who never ever once looked for a job. Their dole should be cut. Travellers dont look for jobs either so f**k them. Plain and simple. Your either part of our society or not. Dont want to contribute ? Then we wont contribute to your social welfare.
 
 


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:46am
Originally posted by Denis Irwin Denis Irwin wrote:

Originally posted by RoyoftheRavers RoyoftheRavers wrote:

There shouldn't be a situation where many people are better off staying on Social Welfare than they would be working. That's why some Irish people will turn their noses up at jobs that some foreigners are only too happy to take up.

 
 
+1


Answer to this  is either cut social welfare rates or to increase the minium wage, or to be a bit imagniative and allow people to hold on to their secondary benefits such as medical card and rent allowance etc for 6 to 12 months after taking up employment etc. 


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:55am
Originally posted by BabbsBalls BabbsBalls wrote:

No benefits for the self-employed affects me directly. When work drys up you don't get a cent . If your genuinely out sick you don't get a cent. It's not right ..

Yeah, but we don't pay anywhere near the same amount into the system that PAYE workers and their employers cough up. 
But I do agree somewhat. Self employed should get some dole/sickpay/disability, even if it is a lower rate to reflect the lower payments.

Why is picture ID is still not used for claimants? 
This was mooted several years ago. If this was a private company paying out this money, this would be done and fully active with a month. 


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:03am
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Answer to this  is either cut social welfare rates or to increase the minium wage, or to be a bit imagniative and allow people to hold on to their secondary benefits such as medical card and rent allowance etc for 6 to 12 months after taking up employment etc. 

That was tried before and had limited success, mainly 'cause once the additional benefits dried up the claimant went back into the system. 6/12 months isn't long enough to get somebody completely re-established in the workplace, especially if they are only earning minimum wages.
Some sort of sliding scale reduction that carried on for 3 years might work.

Painful as it may seem, benefits should be cut for people who use the dole as a permanent life crutch. FFS, even during the height of the celtic tiger we had over 100,000 long term unemployed.


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:03am
Very true Stoked up because private companies do not have to think of issues such as civil liberties.

Comparing the job government to private companies is often an pointless task.

Private companies have a single raisin d'etre which is to make profit for the owner or share holder.

That is not the job of government. They have equity transparency, civil liberties to think of just for starters.

If you think of a policy change in your company in the morning you do jot have to think of the wider public and what interest groups are going to do or legal challenges Or how constitutional it is. There is a reason you are a sole trader and its probably because all that stuff would drive you mad.

Some of it's necessary in a democracy and some I'd it's not bit to simply compare the task of a government dept to a private company is pointless as it's chalk and cheese.

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:14am
Surprised nobody has mentioned pensions which form a massive percentage of the TOtal spend of social welfare and until now have not been touched. I am not arguing for it one way or the other but it's amazing that's it is not part of the debate either here or in other areas.

One issue with means testing is you get levered incentives, basically means testing puts a barrier and it suddenly becomes not worth your while going overbite barrier this could be turning down over time or a pay rise or even a job.

You don't really get these perverse incentives when means testing some of the secondary benefits of the pension such as reduced elec bills tv licence etc. Again not saying I am in favour of it just tossing out ideas

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:17am
Fair enough, private companies operate by different rules, but can you tell why it wasn't introduced?
Civil liberties cannot be the reason as photo ID is used in so many other situations.

It's a load of bollix that photo ID could not be introduced. Banks/Credit Unions all brought this in to avoid fraud. Hell, your new drivers licence has your mug shot in it. Try using somebody else's driving licence when your stopped by the guards and you'll be up in court pronto.

I can accept that it would be impossible to ask PO staff to police this, but the regular interview by SW staff of claimants, looking at a photo ID of said claimant, would stamp this practice out in an instant. 


Posted By: soccerc
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:23am
Originally posted by Stoked Up Stoked Up wrote:

Fair enough, private companies operate by different rules, but can you tell why it wasn't introduced?
Civil liberties cannot be the reason as photo ID is used in so many other situations.

It's a load of bollix that photo ID could not be introduced. Banks/Credit Unions all brought this in to avoid fraud. Hell, your new drivers licence has your mug shot in it. Try using somebody else's driving licence when your stopped by the guards and you'll be up in court pronto.

I can accept that it would be impossible to ask PO staff to police this, but the regular interview by SW staff of claimants, looking at a photo ID of said claimant, would stamp this practice out in an instant. 


It's not the photo part of the ID that is the problem per se but the proposed data to be held on the card concerning the client that has caused Data Protection issues.

From my interactions with various Department sections the system is disjointed and does not offer consistent service levels.  Decentralisation hasn't helped



Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:23am
I honestly don't know why it was not introduced. Do you not have to show ID when collecting social welfare. I know civil liberty groups where concerned before about ID cards etc.

What practice would it cut out, out of curiosity.

People making multiple claims or claiming for others ?

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: soccerc
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:25am
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Surprised nobody has mentioned pensions which form a massive percentage of the TOtal spend of social welfare and until now have not been touched.


Sorry Baldrick but pensions have been reduced, not all, but some including disability.




Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:28am
Soccer from your experience is there any policies which you think are inefficient. Rather than from an operations perspective but actual policies that do not achieve what they set out to achieve or that the cost of the policy is higher than the benefit of having the policy

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:29am
Originally posted by soccerc soccerc wrote:


Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Surprised nobody has mentioned pensions which form a massive percentage of the TOtal spend of social welfare and until now have not been touched.


Sorry Baldrick but pensions have been reduced, not all, but some including disability.




Yes I should have clarified that by saying what was known as the old age Pension

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: jackshat
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:38am
The state pension should be means tested.

-------------
It's Jack Shat


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:42am
Originally posted by soccerc soccerc wrote:

 

It's not the photo part of the ID that is the problem per se but the proposed data to be held on the card concerning the client that has caused Data Protection issues.

From my interactions with various Department sections the system is disjointed and does not offer consistent service levels.  Decentralisation hasn't helped


I can accept that there have been difficulties, but surely it's up to the dept to resolve this issue and do whatever is necessary to resolve it? I still cannot see why the Date protection issues could not be resolved.




Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:45am
Ahhh the Irish approach to everything means test this means test that.


That policy is one of the reasons we have such a two tier system where one group of people largely pay the taxes and see very little back from the state and another group of people do the opposite and it creates poverty traps etc. Universalism works pretty well in many scandanavian countries.

In relation to means testing the pension who are you trying to rule out, I don't quite understand that point. Because as far as I know it is means tested.

http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Department-of-Social-Protection.pdf

Interesting reading this report.

The flexi system on welfare is an interesting idea


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:48am
Originally posted by soccerc soccerc wrote:

 
Sorry Baldrick but pensions have been reduced, not all, but some including disability.

See, this is why claimants getting loot when they shouldn't, irritates me.

Most people on disability have absolutely no choice whatsover and very few have the option of any work.
Cutting their benefits to balance books is callous and unforgivable, when other more obvious ways of reducing the costs are not tackled.





Posted By: soccerc
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:57am
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:



In relation to means testing the pension who are you trying to rule out, I don't quite understand that point. Because as far as I know it is means tested.


Contributory Pension is not means tested but Non contributory is.


Posted By: jackshat
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 2:05am
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Ahhh the Irish approach to everything means test this means test that.


That policy is one of the reasons we have such a two tier system where one group of people largely pay the taxes and see very little back from the state and another group of people do the opposite and it creates poverty traps etc. Universalism works pretty well in many scandanavian countries.

In relation to means testing the pension who are you trying to rule out, I don't quite understand that point. Because as far as I know it is means tested.

http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Department-of-Social-Protection.pdf

Interesting reading this report.

The flexi system on welfare is an interesting idea


It's not means tested. There are multi millionaires out there who are claiming the full state pension.



-------------
It's Jack Shat


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 2:12am
No they are not jack it is means tested. They are just getting the money they put in back.

It's an insurance fund against them retring and they are only getting the money that they put in and if they are millionaires I would say they are getting way less than they put in.

Means testing the contributory pension would be the maddesy policy ever. Talk about a dis incentive to work and pay prsi and it would be particularly harsh on women who go out to work.


If anything I think we should increase contributory benefits over non contributory benefits as an incentive to work funded by a increase in prsi. The prsi model is a good one if used properly in my view. It rewards work and is a safety net when a worker falls on hard times or retires.

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 2:16am
Soccerc has clarifies this. For me I don't deem the contributory pension sangha state pension.

It's basically just getting your own money back. Why this would ever be means tested is beyond me.

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: colemanY2K
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 2:41am
Originally posted by Stoked Up Stoked Up wrote:

Originally posted by soccerc soccerc wrote:

 

It's not the photo part of the ID that is the problem per se but the proposed data to be held on the card concerning the client that has caused Data Protection issues.

From my interactions with various Department sections the system is disjointed and does not offer consistent service levels.  Decentralisation hasn't helped


I can accept that there have been difficulties, but surely it's up to the dept to resolve this issue and do whatever is necessary to resolve it? I still cannot see why the Date protection issues could not be resolved.


I think the argument against ID cards is horsesh*t of the highest order. Why I hear you say? Because people in their everyday lives give away personal information willy nilly on the net, on the street, over the phone or wherever without thinking about it.....signing up for this that and everything. If anything having a national ID will be your only way truly proving your identification (passports can be fraudently copied....just ask the Israeli's).

Ireland is one of only 4 countries in the EU that do not require their citizens to carry IDs. Denmark, Sweden and the UK are the others. The reason Denmark doesn't is because they have a card called the National Health Insurance Card which has all the information on it anyway (no photo), Sweden technically has an ID card but it's not legally required however now a lot of Swedish institutions/banks etc require it therefore their citizens have had to apply for it and campaigners in Britain successfully lobbied against it (even though labour did their best to railroad it in).

Well I didn't mean to rant so long about ID cards but it's a joke when a small number of campaigners cause so much noise that politicians end up sweeping policies or potential legislation that would benefit the country as a whole under the carpet.

Now back to Social Welfare  LOL

It's too easy for a lot of people who are drawing on the dole to remain on it without making any effort. A friend and I were out in our local town a few months ago and my friend made a valid observation in a pub with approx 50 patrons. He said look around which I did....everybody in front of you is on social welfare...and you know what he was right. I was shocked...the people who did have jobs were at home saving the pennies because they were not getting a free house off the council or mortgage protection or whatever else.

The issue is to do with mindset and that will never be changed. We've always been a country of chancers and we'll always be a country of chancers.


-------------
"One of the dominant facts in English life during the past three quarters of a century has been the decay of ability in the ruling class." Orwell, 1942.


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 11:11am
The State (Contributory) Pension is not means tested, it's based on a yearly average of your employment contributions in your working life.  State Non Contributory Pension is means tested.  

You must have photographic ID to CLAIM a Jobseeker's Payment but not necessarily to collect your payment at the Post Office.  Some POs insist on ID, most don't and as far as I know it's not mandatory that you have your ID but you can be asked for it if there's a doubt.  As we all know as well, photo ID can easily be forged.  The "new" Social Welfare Services Card took an eternity to be rolled out thanks to the usual civil liberties bullsh*t and other red-tape, but anyone trying to collect state funds should have this SWS Card that has your photo before it can be paid.  Electronic signing has recently come into being as well in some offices in that the you sign an electronic pad when you're signing on.  If the signatures don't match, suspicions can and will be raised as to ID of the person.


-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 11:53am
Does anyone actually think that the State Contributory Pension should be means tested.  Considering there is a test already to get it which is that you have paid enough stamps over the course of your career. 

To then put in another test would be crazy. 


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Percy
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:05pm
Right Welfare seekers . report for duty tomorrow morning in the phoenix park
You will be supplied with the following on arrival:

Under 65 -orange bib and a sweeping brush

Over 65- yellow bib and a secateurs


Sincerely

Department of the abolition of free money.


-------------
MERRY CHRISTMAS

@IrishPercy


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:09pm
Quick question, what happens if they don't turn up and then you cut off their dole. 

What do you think would happen then. 


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:19pm
if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?

-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:26pm
Whats your definition of usual Citizen.  Is usual that it happens once a week or once a month or once a year or once a decade. 

I know for a fact that civil servants embrace new technology day in day out. I think I have read one story over the last 3 years in relation to finger printing that suggested there was an issue there.  Don't know the ins and outs on it though.


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Green Devil
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:38pm
Originally posted by Percy Percy wrote:

Right Welfare seekers . report for duty tomorrow morning in the phoenix park
You will be supplied with the following on arrival:

Under 65 -orange bib and a sweeping brush

Over 65- yellow bib and a secateurs


Sincerely

Department of the abolition of free money.

LOL


-------------
"He drives two Ferraris; I think he's a very lucky lad to have 50 caps for Ireland,"

Eamonn Dunphy on Glenn Whelan


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:41pm
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Does anyone actually think that the State Contributory Pension should be means tested.  Considering there is a test already to get it which is that you have paid enough stamps over the course of your career. 

To then put in another test would be crazy. 

How many stamps are required Baldy?
I've now had as many years with stamps as without.
At this rate, I'll never be able to retire.


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:44pm
http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/social_welfare/social_welfare_payments/older_and_retired_people/state_pension_contributory.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/social_welfare/social_welfare_payments/older_and_retired_people/state_pension_contributory.html




-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: rossieman
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:44pm
Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?

Well your talking bollocks there.name the last time social welfare staff did this.


Posted By: Justice 2012
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:46pm

Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?
No doubt about it


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:46pm
Rossie I see that Citizen has a rule on another  thread in that he does not engage with clowns, we should probably follow the same advice in relation to the context of this thread.  

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 12:48pm
Originally posted by Stoked Up Stoked Up wrote:

Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Does anyone actually think that the State Contributory Pension should be means tested.  Considering there is a test already to get it which is that you have paid enough stamps over the course of your career. 

To then put in another test would be crazy. 

How many stamps are required Baldy?
I've now had as many years with stamps as without.
At this rate, I'll never be able to retire.


fyou reach pension age on or after April 6 2012, you will need to have 520 paid contributions (10 years paid contributions). In this case, not more than 260 of the 520 contributions may be voluntary contributions. However, if you were a voluntary contributor on or before April 6 1997 and you have a yearly average of 10 contributions, you may meet the requirement if you have a total of 520 contributions, but only 156 need to be compulsory paid contributions.


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: BigPodge
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:08pm
This thread is far too serious to be reading having just woke up, this is the whatever section and there's not even one boob on show in the thread (though a lot of boobs have replied)



-------------


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:09pm
It did say social welfare on the Subject line. 

What were you expecting Podge you sick bastard :) 


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:14pm
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

 
fyou reach pension age on or after April 6 2012, you will need to have 520 paid contributions (10 years paid contributions). In this case, not more than 260 of the 520 contributions may be voluntary contributions. However, if you were a voluntary contributor on or before April 6 1997 and you have a yearly average of 10 contributions, you may meet the requirement if you have a total of 520 contributions, but only 156 need to be compulsory paid contributions.

Ta for the info and the earlier link. By my reckoning, I'll only have about 15 weeks per year contributions from my PAYE term when averaged out over my entire working years, but I would have additional earnings from my fifteen years of part time teaching. 



Posted By: Stoked Up
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:15pm
Originally posted by BigPodge BigPodge wrote:

This thread is far too serious to be reading having just woke up, this is the whatever section and there's not even one boob on show in the thread (though a lot of boobs have replied)


Yeah, shocking sobering stuff for a Sunday morning. Time to go to the pub!


Posted By: BigStrongMan
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:24pm
Off to the Speaker Stoked?

-------------
PM me for all forum moderation queries.


Posted By: rossieman
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:26pm
Originally posted by BigPodge BigPodge wrote:

This thread is far too serious to be reading having just woke up, this is the whatever section and there's not even one boob on show in the thread (though a lot of boobs have replied)


Can you not rub one off thinking of Social welfare?Embarrassed


Posted By: Pipkin
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:26pm
The effective tax rate of the self employed being higher than employeesErmm Are these not the people that we need creating jobs..

Obviously the huge delays between the time that people lose their jobs and finally getting social welfare, which that witch has promised to work on (I wouldnt hold me breath), is a disgrace. What can we do about the dole? There are too many people out there that took out ridiculous mortgages during the boom. You can say its their own fault, which it is, but you have to protect against ruining people's lives. It is called social welfare for a reason.


Posted By: nvidic
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:28pm
Originally posted by Kerrzy Kerrzy wrote:

The effective tax rate of the self employed being higher than employeesErmm Are these not the people that we need creating jobs..

Obviously the huge delays between the time that people lose their jobs and finally getting social welfare, which that witch has promised to work on (I wouldnt hold me breath), is a disgrace. What can we do about the dole? There are too many people out there that took out ridiculous mortgages during the boom. You can say its their own fault, which it is, but you have to protect against ruining people's lives. It is called social welfare for a reason.


This is a massive problem that hasn't been highlighted enough, amazed they're getting away with it.


Posted By: rossieman
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:31pm
Originally posted by Kerrzy Kerrzy wrote:

The effective tax rate of the self employed being higher than employeesErmm Are these not the people that we need creating jobs..

Obviously the huge delays between the time that people lose their jobs and finally getting social welfare, which that witch has promised to work on (I wouldnt hold me breath), is a disgrace. What can we do about the dole? There are too many people out there that took out ridiculous mortgages during the boom. You can say its their own fault, which it is, but you have to protect against ruining people's lives. It is called social welfare for a reason.

The self employed are treated very poorly by the state .


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:37pm
Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?
 
Surprised at you making such a glib and lazy statement Citz.  My office recently brought in the electronic signing I spoke of, no fuss, no resistance and both staff and public very pleased with its implementation.  Civil servants, believe it or not Citz, do move with the times............yes there are dinosaurs and deadwood amongst us, but you get them everywhere.  And finally Citz, have you not heard of the pension levy which in effect was a pay cut by a manufactured name...........as I said Citz, suprised at you making such a lazy Sunday Indo-esque generalisation. Thumbs Down


-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: daboi89
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:45pm
Living at home when ur under 25 needs to be changed.

I was in this situation and worked all through the recession until last month. Your social welfare payment then is based on your mother and fathers earnings and savings.

It would make ya f**king vomitSick


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 1:49pm
Originally posted by daboi89 daboi89 wrote:

Living at home when ur under 25 needs to be changed.

I was in this situation and worked all through the recession until last month. Your social welfare payment then is based on your mother and fathers earnings and savings.

It would make ya f**king vomitSick
 
Agreed, always felt this was far too unrealistic and unfair.


-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 2:38pm
Well done daboi I think that one is really hits the nail on the head for efficiency.  

If anything this drives people out of the family home and into either social housing or other secondary benefits and costing the state more.  




-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Pipkin
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 2:43pm
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Well done daboi I think that one is really hits the nail on the head for efficiency.  

If anything this drives people out of the family home and into either social housing or other secondary benefits and costing the state more.  




A lot of people at this. Have 2 cousins, both qualified teachers with no jobs to be had a couple of years ago. Moved out of family home solely for this reason.


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 3:30pm
Remember though you will then get comments such as

"I know a guy and his Ma and DA are loaded and they give him 200 quid a week and he also gets the dole.

This country is a bloody joke it makes me sick "


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:06pm
Originally posted by rossieman rossieman wrote:

Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?

Well your talking bollocks there.name the last time social welfare staff did this.


yeah really,

http://www.independent.ie/national-news/use-fingerprint-machine-or-lose-wages-staff-told-3009207.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.independent.ie/national-news/use-fingerprint-machine-or-lose-wages-staff-told-3009207.html

Baldrick it was an honest question. Confused


-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:07pm
Read rossiemans post again and then  read the link to your article again.  

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:09pm
did i say welfare staff in my post baldrick? i said civil servants. 

-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:11pm
But as Freewheelers says they are not all the same. 

Its that clueless mentality that you have in relation to this that is the problem.

Its like saying all electricians are the same. 

Your ignorance on this issue is embarassing.


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:16pm
Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?
 
Surprised at you making such a glib and lazy statement Citz.  My office recently brought in the electronic signing I spoke of, no fuss, no resistance and both staff and public very pleased with its implementation.  Civil servants, believe it or not Citz, do move with the times............yes there are dinosaurs and deadwood amongst us, but you get them everywhere.  And finally Citz, have you not heard of the pension levy which in effect was a pay cut by a manufactured name...........as I said Citz, suprised at you making such a lazy Sunday Indo-esque generalisation. Thumbs Down
was not having a pop FW, but they did it in the immigration bureau. Job expansion and public sector unions don't compliment each other. If your being honest do you not think there is a culture of 'thats someone elses job', didn't you say before you were not allowed change the clock an hour forward after the the time went forward an hour in the winter? as 'it was someone elses job'.


-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:19pm
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

But as Freewheelers says they are not all the same. 

Its that clueless mentality that you have in relation to this that is the problem.

Its like saying all electricians are the same. 

Your ignorance on this issue is embarassing.
jaysus sorry i touched a nerve with you baldy, I know enough about the public sector unions to know that they have far too much power and influence. All staff might not be the same, but the unions are, they have to justify their 30euro monthly subs.  they breed entitlement into many public sector workers. Sure how else is it widely recognised that public sector workers cannot get sacked for under-performance.


-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:19pm
There is also a culture of staying back and getting things done for no extra pay and doing what ever it takes but sure that does not fit the lazy cliche that many out there hold. 

Sure there was a whole thread on here about lads taking the piss in shops around the Country. Should we all now tar private sector or shop workers with the same brush.  No we shouldnt beause that would be lazy and glib as FreeWheeler says. 




-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:21pm
Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

Originally posted by FREEWHEELER FREEWHEELER wrote:

Originally posted by Citizen Citizen wrote:

if they bring in new technology will we have the usual case of civil servants refusing to use the machines unless they get a pay rise?
 
Surprised at you making such a glib and lazy statement Citz.  My office recently brought in the electronic signing I spoke of, no fuss, no resistance and both staff and public very pleased with its implementation.  Civil servants, believe it or not Citz, do move with the times............yes there are dinosaurs and deadwood amongst us, but you get them everywhere.  And finally Citz, have you not heard of the pension levy which in effect was a pay cut by a manufactured name...........as I said Citz, suprised at you making such a lazy Sunday Indo-esque generalisation. Thumbs Down
was not having a pop FW, but they did it in the immigration bureau. Job expansion and public sector unions don't compliment each other. If your being honest do you not think there is a culture of 'thats someone elses job', didn't you say before you were not allowed change the clock an hour forward after the the time went forward an hour in the winter? as 'it was someone elses job'.


I would say its the opposite in my experience. 


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Citizen
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:26pm
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

There is also a culture of staying back and getting things done for no extra pay and doing what ever it takes but sure that does not fit the lazy cliche that many out there hold. 

Sure there was a whole thread on here about lads taking the piss in shops around the Country. Should we all now tar private sector or shop workers with the same brush.  No we shouldnt beause that would be lazy and glib as FreeWheeler says. 


maybe so Baldrick, but i lived with a lad who worked in the Dept of an Taoiseach. His weekly work consisted of booking 15 flights per week. If he worked an extra 7 hours a week he was entitled to a an extra day off paid. so he used to stay back and piss about on the internet for an extra seven hours a week. this meant he got an additional day off every week, so he got around 40(extra) days off a year. He revelled in it too. Do you think this is right?

So when people do stay back after hours are you sure no overtime, or time -off inlieu is granted


-------------
My Views are my own and do not in any way represent this site.

'The FAI are the dysfunctional body that other dysfunctional bodies call Galacticos' - Declan Lynch (Sunday Indo)


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 4:34pm
Never trust a sample of 1 as an indication of work practices in any industry. As I said in another post, if we were to do that the whole retail industry would be a joke.  

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 8:00pm
Originally posted by jackshat jackshat wrote:

Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Ahhh the Irish approach to everything means test this means test that.


That policy is one of the reasons we have such a two tier system where one group of people largely pay the taxes and see very little back from the state and another group of people do the opposite and it creates poverty traps etc. Universalism works pretty well in many scandanavian countries.

In relation to means testing the pension who are you trying to rule out, I don't quite understand that point. Because as far as I know it is means tested.

http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Department-of-Social-Protection.pdf

Interesting reading this report.

The flexi system on welfare is an interesting idea


It's not means tested. There are multi millionaires out there who are claiming the full state pension.




Principles of PRSI

The social insurance system is based on two fundamental principles:

The Contributory Principle whereby there is a direct link between contributions paid and entitlement to a varying range of benefits and pensions that are payable as a right – if and when particular contingencies arise, and

The Solidarity Principle whereby contributions paid by insured persons are not actuarially linked to benefits but are instead redistributed to support contributors who are more vulnerable. It is an expression of solidarity between both earning groups and generations.


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: soccerc
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 8:11pm
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Originally posted by jackshat jackshat wrote:

Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Ahhh the Irish approach to everything means test this means test that.


That policy is one of the reasons we have such a two tier system where one group of people largely pay the taxes and see very little back from the state and another group of people do the opposite and it creates poverty traps etc. Universalism works pretty well in many scandanavian countries.

In relation to means testing the pension who are you trying to rule out, I don't quite understand that point. Because as far as I know it is means tested.

http://per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/Department-of-Social-Protection.pdf

Interesting reading this report.

The flexi system on welfare is an interesting idea


It's not means tested. There are multi millionaires out there who are claiming the full state pension.




Principles of PRSI

The social insurance system is based on two fundamental principles:

The Contributory Principle whereby there is a direct link between contributions paid and entitlement to a varying range of benefits and pensions that are payable as a right – if and when particular contingencies arise, and

The Solidarity Principle whereby contributions paid by insured persons are not actuarially linked to benefits but are instead redistributed to support contributors who are more vulnerable. It is an expression of solidarity between both earning groups and generations.


There was also a time when apart from the basic rate you also received a Pay Related benefit, so the more you earned the more you were paid.

Disappeared in the mid 1980's or so


Posted By: GoneToShowgies
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 8:16pm
THere needs to be an Incentive put in place that people on benefits can go back to work and still claim a portion of their benefits in order to make it worth their while.
 
At the moment if a person on a 3day week claiming benefits is offered a 5 day week its likely not worth their while to accept the extra work. THey would loose their benefits and their medical card, their partner would loose their benefits and their medical card too cause they are means tested. It means a person goes back to work for very little extra.


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 8:17pm
The thread is in danger again of becoming Civil Servant bashing.............I know absolutely that there are sections in my own Dept where people are twiddling their thumbs, that is wrong, wrong, wrong and totally should be addressed.  The coalface staff such as Local Office and Revenue and Passport staff are doing an extremely selfless, dedicated and professional performance and I just felt Citizen your throwaway comment was a bit reckless and ill-thought out.

Fundamental flaws in the SW system need to be tackled and career scratcher people should definitely not be on the maximum payment rate for their whole lives and then get a Non-Contributory State Pension when they hit that age and the other sundry allowances one gets at 66, that's just daft and unsustainable and the Troika will surely insist on implementing changes. 


-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: AndyMc
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 8:54pm
I work in an area where we hire a high number of part time,
Flexible staff.

A huge problem for people is that I might offer them 2/3 hours work in a day, and they refuse because the minute you class a day a worked, your entitlements are forfeited.

At the moment the system would appear to be days unemployed, minus days worked, equals days paid.

A better system would possibly be 37.5 hours, minus hours worked = hours paid.


I sadly hear nearly everyday "it's not worth my while to work" for one reason or another.

-------------
Simon: No-one brings a bag of sh*t to a pub

Jay: Your dad does

Simon: Does he?

Jay: Yeah, your mum



Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 9:28pm
Well said FW,  I put up the thread to look at policy issues and issues that could improve the country while not bashing any section. 

I think the last comment by Andy says it all there is people out there who want to work but if its not worth their while its ok sayin well they should go out and work, that maybe fine for a single person like myself who does not have huge responsiblities.  The minute you put kids into the situation, you have to make the most financially viable decision for you and your family and while you may be better off in the long run taking a risk and taking the job, it is a risk and I can understand how a lad with 2 kids and a wife may think twice about forgoing his medical card etc in order to take a job he may be let go of in a few weeks.  That does not mean that person is a lazy sh*te who does not want to work but he is stuck in a bind of wantin to work and also do whats best for his family.

I do think a system of longer holding on to benefits while going back to work I said initially of 6-12 months but maybe its 18 to to 24 months. 

We certainliy more linkages between industry and the department on this. I know Germany durin their recession reduced workin weeks much more than they let people go.  As a result when the orders went up they were in a position to respond to the growth as they did not need to re hire people etc. 

In Ireland despite what people have said earlier we are one of the easiest countries in Europe to Hire and Fire people.  This may seem great in the short term for employers but it comces back to that decision that the guy with his two kids has, is it worth my while taking that job. 


-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 9:31pm
Also I am in danger of this myself but the unemployment rate is 314,700 rather  than the 439,200 which is often quoted.  That is the live register rate the extra 120,00 people are people who are working part time and claming some form of JA or JB.  

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 04 Mar 2012 at 10:28pm
Replacement Rates
The replacement rate (RR) for given income levels measures the proportion of out-of-work benefits received when unemployed against take home pay if in work. While there is no pre-determined level of replacement rate which would influence every individual’s decision to work, clearly the higher the replacement rate, the lower the incentive to work. A replacement rate in excess of 70% is considered to be excessive.
Successive analyses of replacement rates demonstrate that, in most cases, people will be significantly better off in employment than on social welfare – even if that employment is at the minimum wage. Analysis of typical family types on the Live-Register shows that:
When compared to National Minimum Wage income:
- 82% have an RR less than 70%
- 18% have an RR less than 80%
When compared to 67% of Average Industrial Earnings income:
- 82% have an RR less than 60%
- 12% have an RR less than 70%
- 6% have an RR less than 80%
Where higher replacement rates occur they tend to be associated with higher numbers of child dependents in family households.

thats from www.welfare.ie

Interesting stuff, goes to show that the issue with Replacement rates is largely with those with larger families. 

A policy worth looking at therefore would be that those with kids could keep some of the secondary benefits for the first 18 months of their new job especially those ones relating to children. 




-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: daboi89
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 2:43am
Originally posted by Baldrick Baldrick wrote:

Well done daboi I think that one is really hits the nail on the head for efficiency.  

If anything this drives people out of the family home and into either social housing or other secondary benefits and costing the state more.  


I get 84.50 a week from the social welfareClap

Precisly the reason, Ive a meeting with an Australian construction company regarding a sponsorship on Thursday.

Rant Over.  


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 10:44am
Where you a sole Trader daboi paying the S stamp.

I think that seriously needs to be looked at, they need to up the PRSI contributions made by sole traders to that there is an insurance fund for them to tap into  if their business drops off.




-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: ProfesserGreenPaul
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 4:39pm
Does anybody have problems with working part time? I got offered work in schools teaching special needs but only doing one hour a day but for 3 days. I said it to social welfare and they said  once you are working during the day you lose a full day's payment. I laughed and said I only work for 60 minutes of the day and so they told me if I work the 3 days I lose 3 days pay. So if I took the job I will be losing €40 a week not including travel there and back. They make it impossible for anybody to work part time

-------------
Trapnoclue wants to marry Paul Green


Posted By: rossieman
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 5:25pm
Originally posted by ProfesserGreenPaul ProfesserGreenPaul wrote:

Does anybody have problems with working part time? I got offered work in schools teaching special needs but only doing one hour a day but for 3 days. I said it to social welfare and they said  once you are working during the day you lose a full day's payment. I laughed and said I only work for 60 minutes of the day and so they told me if I work the 3 days I lose 3 days pay. So if I took the job I will be losing €40 a week not including travel there and back. They make it impossible for anybody to work part time
They would put you on casual jobseekers and once you work a day(except sunday) it cuts off that days benefit.


Posted By: harry
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 10:55pm
Interesting how we are not having a debate about Judge Mary Devins comments,
wonder is it because we were in the Country she was talking about this Summer Smile


Posted By: rossieman
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 10:56pm
Originally posted by harry harry wrote:

Interesting how we are not having a debate about Judge Mary Devins comments,
wonder is it because we were in the Country she was talking about this Summer Smile

What she say?


Posted By: harry
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:02pm
She said our social welfare system was a holiday for the Polish people!
Something along those lines anyway


Posted By: deise316
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:14pm
Originally posted by harry harry wrote:

Interesting how we are not having a debate about Judge Mary Devins comments,
wonder is it because we were in the Country she was talking about this Summer Smile


Think yer on the wrong site bud LOL. Looking at today's Examiner, tis not the first time she has made comments re social welfare recipients (not Polish people though, that was a new addition). Don't really see any reason to discuss her comments, they are factually incorrect. There are residents of certain other nations (better be careful here) who possibly could be accused of living off the state to an extent, but I think it is fair to say the Irish perception of Polish people (and for that matter, Latvians, Lithuanians, Slovakians, Estonians) would be hard working people (nearly everybody has worked with a person or people from the aforementioned nations and others in the past few years) who aren't here to scrounge. Bound to be a few exceptions, but in comparison to the percentage of Irish wasters who never worked, even when times were good, minimal. 

Your post does not read that clearly to me, are you implying that you agree with Judge Devins comments (which she has publically apologised twice for) and the reason we on here are not talking about it is because a lot of us were in Poland for the summer ?

Having said that, the Polish  Irish organisations accepted her apology and withdrew their complaint (they had threatened to complain her to the gardai, correctly so, in my opinion), something tells me had she made the same comments about a person of African origin, she wouldn't be a Judge by tommorrow evening. 





-------------
Picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.....


Posted By: harry
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:19pm
Not saying i agree although there is a minority of them doing so no more than our own of course but ya if we were not in Poland during the Summer i think there would be a fair few on here today lashing out at the Poles IMO Smile


Posted By: deise316
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:31pm
Originally posted by harry harry wrote:

Not saying i agree although there is a minority of them doing so no more than our own of course but ya if we were not in Poland during the Summer i think there would be a fair few on here today lashing out at the Poles IMO Smile


Hmm, I don't, can't really remember any Pole- bashing threads here before June. Even if you decided you didn't like them (as illogical as it is to dislike an entire nation of people) before, in the middle of, or after June, I think her comments strike people as completely wrong given the experiences the majority of us (Irish people, not just posters on here) have had of working with Europeans in the previous years. Which is probably why there is not a thread on here giving out about Polish people. 
But hey, start one if you wantLOL







-------------
Picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.....


Posted By: harry
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:37pm
nah wont bother think you'd win the debate LOL 


Posted By: Smartalex
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:39pm
generally they are sound but there is too many of them here

there ive said it




Posted By: irishmufc
Date Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:40pm
Im finished college since may and im still waiting for my part time work welfare claim to be processed.have to do an interview and resubmit forms ive already sent in . they re fairly cracking down on fraud. huge backlog

-------------
Wings? They're only the band The Beatles could have been.


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 12:39am
Her comments were a disgrace and I am glad she has apologised.

The poles are a great bunch of people by and large and hard working friendly peoole.

No defending her comments in anyway.

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt


Posted By: irishmufc
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 12:49am
Devins nickname is judge judy in mayo. She was done for drink driving or speeding years ago and one boy racer who was up in court for a similar offence brought it up to her . fair play to him but probably not a smart move

-------------
Wings? They're only the band The Beatles could have been.


Posted By: Green Devil
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 1:01am
Knowing people my own age and older who haven't worked full time or even part time since they left school , have no plans on going to college or any intention of getting a job its baffling as to why they get the full amount on the dole? 

There are jobs or courses out there if they genuinely wanted to apply but why would they bother when they aren't even pushed by the Social Welfare to do so? If a person worked and got let go , have been in regular employment or even working their whole life and got let go i'd say fair enough atleast you worked and tried better yourself , but there are so many young and fit people out there who could be made earn their €188 a week even if its doing 10 hours a week with the council , going into schools helping during art or PE for example etc etc.

Iv'e been on the dole on 2 occasions at different times , i had left my job to try and go back to college then i ended up breaking my leg and coming home from Canada was the other. Iv'e been doing 1 year courses at a time to try and better myself an its been great for the self esteem. I found out a few weeks ago that i got into college as a full time student , its a 4 year course and i'm over the moon because i really tried! That's all i could have done tried and thankfully it worked out , but there are many others out there who don't and will not try? College isn't for everyone i know that , but if you throw in a 100 cv's around a few towns within a certain radius there is a good chance an interview could crop up. Its the attitude of "there are no jobs" from people who have no interest in working pisses me off.



-------------
"He drives two Ferraris; I think he's a very lucky lad to have 50 caps for Ireland,"

Eamonn Dunphy on Glenn Whelan


Posted By: Barry
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 1:35am

The dole should be back to €204 per week. Minimum wage should be increased. The likes of MacDonalds etc should be forced to pay big wages, these motherless f**ks are some of the richiest corporations in the world.



Posted By: David McWilliams
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 1:42am
Originally posted by The Q Man The Q Man wrote:

The dole should be back to €204 per week. Minimum wage should be increased. The likes of MacDonalds etc should be forced to pay big wages, these motherless f**ks are some of the richiest corporations in the world.

 
And then McDonalds would create robots to take orders, a few workers to cook the food and you'd have more on the Dole queues.
 
 
My steps would be...
Abolish a lot of regulation and red tape reverting to an almost entirely free market.
Reduce corporation tax to 10%
Keep the government in check allowing enterprises to run freely
keep the budget balanced as to stabalise the economy.
And keep the path to growth free.
 
We should also be encouraging the private enterprises to compete in healthcare, education (especially) and in transport and other government services


Posted By: Barry
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 1:48am
Originally posted by David McWilliams David McWilliams wrote:

Originally posted by The Q Man The Q Man wrote:

The dole should be back to €204 per week. Minimum wage should be increased. The likes of MacDonalds etc should be forced to pay big wages, these motherless f**ks are some of the richiest corporations in the world.

 
And then McDonalds would create robots to take orders, a few workers to cook the food and you'd have more on the Dole queues.
 
 
My steps would be...
Abolish a lot of regulation and red tape reverting to an almost entirely free market.
Reduce corporation tax to 10%
Keep the government in check allowing enterprises to run freely
keep the budget balanced as to stabalise the economy.
And keep the path to growth free.
 
We should also be encouraging the private enterprises to compete in healthcare, education (especially) and in transport and other government services
 
 
ShockedShockedShockedShocked
 


Posted By: David McWilliams
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 1:52am
Originally posted by The Q Man The Q Man wrote:

Originally posted by David McWilliams David McWilliams wrote:

Originally posted by The Q Man The Q Man wrote:

The dole should be back to €204 per week. Minimum wage should be increased. The likes of MacDonalds etc should be forced to pay big wages, these motherless f**ks are some of the richiest corporations in the world.

 
And then McDonalds would create robots to take orders, a few workers to cook the food and you'd have more on the Dole queues.
 
 
My steps would be...
Abolish a lot of regulation and red tape reverting to an almost entirely free market.
Reduce corporation tax to 10%
Keep the government in check allowing enterprises to run freely
keep the budget balanced as to stabalise the economy.
And keep the path to growth free.
 
We should also be encouraging the private enterprises to compete in healthcare, education (especially) and in transport and other government services
 
 
ShockedShockedShockedShocked
 
 
That picture won't show but I'm guessing we're talking about different things.
 
 
 


Posted By: corkery
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 1:54am
Originally posted by athlonecelt athlonecelt wrote:

Ive one huge Gripe. During the Celtic Tiger, Anyone that wanted a job could have a job. I mean anyone. My local estate was being developed and the developer was struggling to get a lad to drive a road sweeper. Obviously, theres many unfortunate souls with special needs, and certain disadvantages and disabilities who werent getting jobs wherever they applied. But. There are thousands and thousand of ****s , who fill courtrooms every day for unsocial sh*te who never ever once looked for a job. Their dole should be cut. Travellers dont look for jobs either so f**k them. Plain and simple. Your either part of our society or not. Dont want to contribute ? Then we wont contribute to your social welfare.
 
 


Have you ever tried saying that to a Labour Party member? Was having this debate before and a few of them claimed that there was only €20m welfare fraud in Ireland.  My friend signed on when he was 18, never once looked for a job, that was 3 years ago and he's still getting money. Fair enough like that there's no work but at least make them look for it.




-------------
'The younger generation as in 17 -25 are certainly gayer than their predecessors. I think they may cause the extinction of the human race with their activities.'- Baldrick


Posted By: samscafe
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 7:52am
everyone would feel so much better if the poor were made to dress like the poor and ritually humiliated each week.  FFS!!
 
Ten times more fraud committed by the wealthy tax dodging basturts 


-------------
Certain mods are complete wankstains


Posted By: FREEWHEELER
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 8:41am
Yet another STUPID, BRAINLESS, judge, her comments were an outrage.  Fookwit.




-------------
We'll never die, we'll never die, we'll keep the Green Flag flying high......Shamrock Rovers will never die, we'll keep the Green Flag Flying high. 19 Leagues and 25 Cups.....


Posted By: t_rAndy
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 8:44am

My missus friend recently went back to work. Single mother with one child. She was getting a rent allowance and the dole and maybe some other single mother payment. But she wanted to get back to working for herself. This required her to get a child minder etc.

Anyway they cut her rent allowance by so much that between paying for the child minder and travel costs etc she was actually coming out with 200 euro a month less than sitting on her hole not doing a dribble. She had to quit her job. There is no incentive to go back to work.
 
 


Posted By: Baldrick
Date Posted: 03 Aug 2012 at 9:52am
Perverse incentives in the system are a big problem alright.

-------------
AKA pedantic kunt



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.00 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net