Next manager

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

 The GerK wrote:

 TooOldForThis wrote:

 The GerK wrote:

 TooOldForThis wrote:

 The GerK wrote:

 TooOldForThis wrote:

 E2016 wrote:

 TooOldForThis wrote:

Just read the Canham statement and his "apology". With no explanation whatsoever as to why the process was not completed in "early April" as promised. No explanation in relation to "contractual obligations". An apology without an explanation is not good enough. An apology with an explanation would still probably not be good enough! If something went seriously wrong they should just state that. They don't have to name any individual or throw anyone under the bus. Canham will be gone by end of year anyway, but if he has any integrity he should just go now.

You spent months telling everyone how wrong they were when it was as obvious as the sky being blue what was happening. You tried to discredit every single journalist as being unreliable, every single forum member who voiced concern as idiotic.

You're never leaving this down.

I do apologise, if I in any way, appeared to dismiss or diminish your grave concerns on this matter. I was wrong, my opinion was wrong, I chose to believe Canham, as opposed to, say believing someone like you. For that I will will be eternally regretful. Further, I can offer you my full assurance that in the future I will believe our intrepid football correspondents, even when on a daily basis, they announce so and so is now firmly "in the frame". And of course, we will have daily updates from our journos for the next 6 months. Please continue to closely monitor my posts for any future egregious opinions which lie outside the YBIG Overton window.
Sincerely,
Jonathan.

Your problem was your blind distrust with the reporters. 
They have been, by and large, on the ball for the whole process. 

Names were 'firmly' linked as they were talked to. 

Is there even one name what was reported on that was wrong?

I'm not the one who specifically named individual journalists and labelled them..."clowns", "spoofers" and "charlatans". Simply stating that "sources claim" and "the Irish Independent understands" is not high quality journalism, particularly when the claims are mutually contradictory, on a week to week basis. If you list every manager under the sun as being "in the frame" I suppose you will eventually hit the jackpot. In terms of sport journalists, big fan of Michael Walker and Paul Kimmage. In terms of incorrect names, where is the confirmation that Coleman turned down the Ireland job? Please don't say Wales Online. 

No. That was a BBC reporter
You want journalists to name sources?
See, that just shows how little you know about how it works.

They have been consistent right in this.
You have got nothing right and have come out looking foolish 
Lets put it this way, their "sources" are not exactly Deepthroat calibre! And considering the tit you made of yourself on here yesterday, not sure you are in a position to call a poster foolish.

When did I make a tit of myself?

You're the forum  in this thread. 

That's undisputed 
Quite a sensitve chap around criticism of Irish football
journalists. When did you make a tit of yourself?
Re-check your copy, not your strong point I know. 