You Boys in Green Homepage YBIG Shop
Forum Home Forum Home : International : Republic Of Ireland
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - FAI and FIFA
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


FAI and FIFA

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
Territorial View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 5817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Territorial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 3:24pm
Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

Each to their own, but I don't think football belongs to the established countries. Every team should have a chance to playat a World Cup.

But "football" is more than just the World Cup Finals which ultimately are designed to find the best international team(s) in the world. Otherwise why have qualification matches to get there and knockout rounds once you have? Surely such a qualfication process should be based on merit and excellence, not some misplaced sympathy for countries which can't cut it otherwise?

So that if eg Africa wants extra representation at a Finals, then their leading teams should be required to prove by their performances in Finals that their second-ranked teans deserve the chance to join them.

And if these Finals are anything to go by, unless Morocco pull a rabbit out of a hat, then CAF will once again have failed to demonstrate why they deserve even five teams in 2026, never mind eight.

Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

Euros going to 8 and World Cup to 24 in the 80's allowed Ireland to qualify, you don't think that had a legacy on the popularity on the game here?
This is NOT a dig at the ROI team in particular, but now you mention it, what exactly was their "legacy"?

Did the FAI get a shiny big National stadium of its own out if it? A modern national training centre? Decent LOI stadia fit for the 21st century, hosting a noticeably higher standard of domestic football before sold-out crowds every week? Better facilities and greater participation at grassroots level, consistent with a growing and wealthier population? More and better coaches, with the best of them moving abroad to top clubs in top leagues? The (GB-born and developed) Granny Rulers of the Charlton/McCarthy years since replaced by equivalent standard home-grown players?

Theres' no doubt ROI gets very impressive crowds for 6 or 8 home international matches every year, and takes great numbers of enthusiastic and welcome supporters to away games etc, but realistically, how many of those are "barstoolers", and/or supporters of Celtic/Man Utd/Liverpool etc?

[And before anyone jumps in, I would level pretty much the same criticisms at the IFA/NI, after our glory years of the 1980's etc.]




Edited by Territorial - 05 Dec 2022 at 3:25pm
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Shedite View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton
Avatar

Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 9795
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shedite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 3:56pm
Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

Each to their own, but I don't think football belongs to the established countries. Every team should have a chance to playat a World Cup.

But "football" is more than just the World Cup Finals which ultimately are designed to find the best international team(s) in the world. Otherwise why have qualification matches to get there and knockout rounds once you have? Surely such a qualfication process should be based on merit and excellence, not some misplaced sympathy for countries which can't cut it otherwise?

So that if eg Africa wants extra representation at a Finals, then their leading teams should be required to prove by their performances in Finals that their second-ranked teans deserve the chance to join them.

And if these Finals are anything to go by, unless Morocco pull a rabbit out of a hat, then CAF will once again have failed to demonstrate why they deserve even five teams in 2026, never mind eight.
Same reason we have qualification for Champions League that isn't just "what leagues got to knockout stages last year". I don't want more European teams in the WC group stages for the same reason I don't want more English/Spanish clubs in Champions League group stage.

Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I prefer watching Egypt/Nigeria/Colombia in the WC than Sweden/Slovakia/Ukraine. I watch Sweden/Slovakia/Ukraine on Nations League highlights show 6 times a year.

Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

Euros going to 8 and World Cup to 24 in the 80's allowed Ireland to qualify, you don't think that had a legacy on the popularity on the game here?
This is NOT a dig at the ROI team in particular, but now you mention it, what exactly was their "legacy"?

Did the FAI get a shiny big National stadium of its own out if it? A modern national training centre? Decent LOI stadia fit for the 21st century, hosting a noticeably higher standard of domestic football before sold-out crowds every week? Better facilities and greater participation at grassroots level, consistent with a growing and wealthier population? More and better coaches, with the best of them moving abroad to top clubs in top leagues? The (GB-born and developed) Granny Rulers of the Charlton/McCarthy years since replaced by equivalent standard home-grown players?

Theres' no doubt ROI gets very impressive crowds for 6 or 8 home international matches every year, and takes great numbers of enthusiastic and welcome supporters to away games etc, but realistically, how many of those are "barstoolers", and/or supporters of Celtic/Man Utd/Liverpool etc?

[And before anyone jumps in, I would level pretty much the same criticisms at the IFA/NI, after our glory years of the 1980's etc.]
I'm not old enough to remember but heard a lot of stories about how football in Ireland was looked down on in pre-88. Dunphy had a good emotional rant about it 
Back to Top
dangere_here View Drop Down
Kevin Kilbane
Kevin Kilbane


Joined: 24 Nov 2018
Status: Offline
Points: 441
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dangere_here Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 4:52pm
Probably some of the more senior posters on here can explain better but even in my life time, football was exclusively the GAA variety in most of the country outside the traditional cities. The success of the Charlton era in the late 80s early 90s opened up the sport in very rural places where kids were suddenly wearing football jerseys or pretending to be Packie Bonner, which would have been unheard of ten years before in Ballygobackwards. You can argue whether they should have been wearing LOI jerseys instead of Liverpool, but that was the legacy of the Charlton era. Look at the place the chap who scored the winning goal against Germany in 2015 comes from. Back in the day, I doubt anybody there saw a game of association football, let alone played it. 

Edited by dangere_here - 05 Dec 2022 at 4:55pm
Back to Top
Territorial View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 5817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Territorial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 5:32pm
Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

I don't want more European teams in the WC group stages for the same reason I don't want more English/Spanish clubs in Champions League group stage.

Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I prefer watching Egypt/Nigeria/Colombia in the WC than Sweden/Slovakia/Ukraine. I watch Sweden/Slovakia/Ukraine on Nations League highlights show 6 times a year.
If it's a trade-off between watching competitive games involving  European teams with whom we're familiar, versus new, but third rate, teams from Africa or Asia in uncompetitive or  meaningless games, then I am going for the former.

Bear in mind, too, that there will be 63 games in this Finals, whereas 2026 will have 80 games i.e. even if every one was a cracker, there simply isn't enough time in the day to keep up with all of them.

And that's if they don't stick with the format of 16 groups of 3 teams etc. There is talk now of reconfiguring 2026 to involve 12 groups of 4 teams. This would produce 104 games!
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/dec/01/world-cup-organisers-consider-ditching-three-team-group-format-for-2026

So Ivory Coast versus Denmark might be preferable to you over Switzerland versus Denmark, for imstance. But Ivory Coast versus Bolivia, kicking off at the same time as Kenya versus Iraq and New Zealand versus El Salvador, with none of them having any hope of progressing?

What would Dunphy have to say about that! Wink

Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

]I'm not old enough to remember but heard a lot of stories about how football in Ireland was looked down on in pre-88. Dunphy had a good emotional rant about it 
Trust me, it wasn't just in ROI/NI, football was severely looked down upon in GB too, arguably more so - eg Hillsborough/Heysel/Bradford; hooliganism/racism/sexism; dwindling crowds in sh*t stadia with terrible facilities etc
 
And I firmly believe it was a combination of Gazza's tears at Italia 90, and the PL/Sky, with all the money that brought in, which first stopped the rot, then turned it round.

All of which had something of a a spillove, popularity-wise, in Scotland/Wales/ROI and NI, since the game in those countries has so many links with the English game.

But if the game's image has turned round markedly in the period since, it is only the English game which has taken full advantage, for I contend that there has been little or no corresponding practical or physical legacy for domestic football in ROI, whether stemming from developments in England or from ROI's successes in the World Cup or Euro's.

Contrast that eg with the success eg of GAA, professional Rugby, Golf or Horse racing over the last 30 years in developing their sports to keep up with the times. Why even Irish Cricket has progressed to Test status!



Edited by Territorial - 05 Dec 2022 at 5:39pm
Back to Top
Shedite View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton
Avatar

Joined: 09 Dec 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 9795
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shedite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 6:09pm
Originally posted by Territorial Territorial wrote:

Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

I don't want more European teams in the WC group stages for the same reason I don't want more English/Spanish clubs in Champions League group stage.

Sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I prefer watching Egypt/Nigeria/Colombia in the WC than Sweden/Slovakia/Ukraine. I watch Sweden/Slovakia/Ukraine on Nations League highlights show 6 times a year.
If it's a trade-off between watching competitive games involving  European teams with whom we're familiar, versus new, but third rate, teams from Africa or Asia in uncompetitive or  meaningless games, then I am going for the former.

Bear in mind, too, that there will be 63 games in this Finals, whereas 2026 will have 80 games i.e. even if every one was a cracker, there simply isn't enough time in the day to keep up with all of them.

And that's if they don't stick with the format of 16 groups of 3 teams etc. There is talk now of reconfiguring 2026 to involve 12 groups of 4 teams. This would produce 104 games!

So Ivory Coast versus Denmark might be preferable to you over Switzerland versus Denmark, for imstance. But Ivory Coast versus Bolivia, kicking off at the same time as Kenya versus Iraq and New Zealand versus El Salvador, with none of them having any hope of progressing?

What would Dunphy have to say about that! Wink

Yeah I've said from the off that I'm against expanding to 48, and as ya said even FIFA have already seen the stupidity in the groups of 3, that'll be canned anyway.

You're picking all the 4th placed teams in your examples there. They wouldn't be in the same groups. 

And yeah, I'm all for teams like Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Tunisia, Iran, Costa Rica, Ghana, Ecuador, Senegal, Cameroon all who won games in this World Cup over more Wales, Serbia, Denmark who stunk the place up.
Back to Top
Territorial View Drop Down
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 5817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Territorial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Dec 2022 at 6:55pm
Originally posted by Shedite Shedite wrote:

And yeah, I'm all for teams like Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Tunisia, Iran, Costa Rica, Ghana, Ecuador, Senegal, Cameroon all who won games in this World Cup over more Wales, Serbia, Denmark who stunk the place up.
I'm not arguing against all those teams you cite admiringly from taking their place in Qatar.

But while they may have had some good individual performances which stick in the mind, you overlook the poor performances eg Spain beating Costa Rica 7-0; or Saudi losing to moderate teams like  Poland and Mexico. Also the failure of 7 of the 9 even to get out of their Group.

More importantly, you seem to overlook that those are the best of Africa, Asia and Central America. How entertaining or interesting do you think the second rate teams from those regions would be in 2026, when a predictable defeat in their first game would effectively render their second game meaningless and send them on their way back home.

I fear that eg Qatar this time would provide a closer template i.e. Played 3, Lost 3, Scored 1 Conceded 7 - and that with the benefit of home advantage!


Edited by Territorial - 05 Dec 2022 at 6:57pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.00
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.