Coronavirus - Remain Calm. Do Not Panic |
Post Reply | Page <1 406407408409410 839> |
Author | |||
BabbsBalls
Moderator Group Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 10223 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Here’s a policy for you .
Let those under 65 do what they think is right. If an 18 year old who lives with his granny in number 2 wants to flaunt the rules that’s on him and his conscience. The man who runs a business next door in number 3 who is stringent in his hygiene and social distancing shouldn’t suffer because of the thick next door to him. Those over 65 can make their own choices. If they are worried about contacting the virus which a lot understandably are they can make their own bubbles as they see fit. My mother is nearly 65. If she rings me and says she would like to see her two your old grandson I’m not going to say no, my door is closed. She’s made her decision and I will respect it but maintain social distancing. It’s not fair that those who think this way are labelled far right, trump loving nazis (which happens in this thread daily) who like to march at the weekend. Personally, I think those marching during the week are f**king idiots as the minimum we can do is wear a mask and social distance, large gatherings are a bad idea, you don’t have to be an expert for the penny to drop on the one. Comically, I was called a nazi yesterday by someone who thinks our overlords are correct to tell us all what to do while I would be more for the above. Ya gotta laugh like. That’s the internet for you I guess - you aren’t entitled to an opinion if it doesn’t match mine. |
|||
l hear you are a racist now, father ?
|
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But you see this is based on two things: i) the fantasy that if the virus spreads widely among the under 65s, that it can magically be kept away from the over 65s It can't ii) The idea that there is no such thing as society and individuals should be able to have no obligation or sense of responsibility whatsoever in a situation where there is a massive collective problem which can only be solved by collective action That is indeed Thatcherism and US right-wing libertarian ideology Nice bit of "poor me" victimhood thrown in at the end When you can't defend an opinion, always claim victimhood - that's the modern social media mantra Still waiting for your actual policy recommendations Edited by sid waddell - 25 Oct 2020 at 10:44am |
|||
BabbsBalls
Moderator Group Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 10223 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Victimhood. You must think I was offended. I was nearly on the floor laughing 😂
|
|||
l hear you are a racist now, father ?
|
|||
BabbsBalls
Moderator Group Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 10223 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Pubs/restauratants - Any of them I was in we’re operating perfectly in terms of social distance and hygiene with their booking systems. I honestly didn’t see a need to close them fully, granted they probably weren’t making enough money with the low capacities.
Sporting events and Gigs - No , unfortunately. Shops - Open them all. If we can buy groceries safely we can buy boxer shorts.
Mask/social distancing - Duh |
|||
l hear you are a racist now, father ?
|
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
That's what you went for though Babbs - feigned victimhood My posts addressed at you have been very fair and reasonable The reason my interest was piqued by your views was because you started out by claiming the whole thing was a "load a bollox" But that's clearly wrong - it isn't a "load a bollox" |
|||
BabbsBalls
Moderator Group Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 10223 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Anything else ? I’ve a pain in my hole going around in circles on here..
|
|||
l hear you are a racist now, father ?
|
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But we had something like that, it was called Level 2, and it wasn't working Cases were exploding and as "a rising tide lifts all boats", that did indeed mean we were heading for an overwhelming of the health system at some point this winter and a considerably rising death toll, not just from Covid but from all causes, because the more Covid there is around, the less the health system will be able to deal with non-Covid medical problems If the mantra is that "people should make their own decisions", it pretty much destroys any hope of collective action solving the problem, because many people will make decisions that only benefit them and pay no heed to the well being of others Again, this is a collective problem which can only be solved by collective action Follow the logic, if pub owners are allowed "make their own decisions", well, they aren't going to enforce restrictions which are aimed at reducing virus spread, they're going to get as many people in the door as possible What you are arguing for is a policy that has been proven to not work The mantra of "let people make their own decisions", if followed to its logical conclusion, would result in people deciding not to wear seat belts or drink drive Followed to its logical conclusion, it would result in the abolition of all tax That's why I get suspicious when people say "let people make their own decisions" Because it's a broad brush statement that is treated as an absolute by a lot of people, in this situation, can only result in the constant growth of virus spread, with disastrous implications for society |
|||
t_rAndy
Robbie Keane Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 26217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
There is no right answer. Lockdowns work to a degree but I think will only really work if we do a full one. With construction, schools, many shops still open, kids still out playing, teams still training, I can’t see numbers coming down.
I would say we live in level 2 or 3 but with a ban on household visits. This way, when people do meet out they can do so in more controlled environments. In addition, there should be guidance that maybe you should only meet with one other household so you are preventing big gatherings. This way, the economy remains open and it’s not that much different than what we are currently living under. Then as babbs says, it will be up to the individual to decide if they want to go out or stay at home. The reality is, a large percentage of the population are not scared of the virus because it’s just a mild flu for most, it’s not the plague which people feared the first time round when there were videos of people dropping dead in China, etc. So people are living within the rules so I think we need to find the happy medium to protect the vulnerable but keep the economy going. So my policy is level 2 with indoor household visit bans
|
|||
Cabra Hoop
Roy Keane Joined: 06 Feb 2012 Location: Royal County Status: Offline Points: 10825 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
A few thoughts on this..it obvious the 'fear factor' which was the catylast for people's behaviour in the early months of the pandemic has dissipated in the last few months. While it is true that increased number of cases had led to an increase in ICU and hospitalization it would appear that a lot of people are prepared to accept this as the numbers are currently a level which is not comparable with earlier in the year. The mixed messages and general clock ups be it with the LC, Clifden, Hand Sanitizers had made a lot reflect on the way things are being handled and weakened support for restrictions.
|
|||
" BFC always gives me a laugh........ "
|
|||
Trap junior
Robbie Keane YBIG Minister of Doom & Gloom Joined: 25 Jan 2010 Location: Irish Riviera Status: Offline Points: 39772 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Swift and Babbs agree with masks and social distancing, hand washing etc but also think its a good idea to invite 6 friends over to the house for cans. Dumb and Dumber.
Edited by Trap junior - 25 Oct 2020 at 11:12am |
|||
Pied Piper to: Baldrick, Brendan 88, 9Fingers, Borussia and more...
97.6% chance this post will be replied to by Baldrick (source: PWC) |
|||
t_rAndy
Robbie Keane Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 26217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
TJ, they have the choice if they want to risk getting a mild flu and bring it into their household. I doubt they would take that risk if they have someone vulnerable in the house. They wear a mask in case they have picked it up somewhere and to help stop the spread to others. That is the reality that most people are basing their behaviour off of
|
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But we tried to find a happy medium and it didn't work It may be true that the virus will not be harmful for most, but it is very dangerous for a considerable proportion of the population There is also plenty of evidence that Covid may be harmful in the long term to a minority of younger people who would not expect it to be so The behaviour of the majority of the population determines the consequences for a minority It is simply not the case that that majority of the population can behave as they like without consequences for the vulnerable It's a collective action problem dependent on the behaviour of all of society Collective action problems require widespread buy in from the population And when that doesn't happen, the whole population suffers The focus needs to be on creating a long term suppression strategy - but that will also require collective action - that's the only way we can deal with this |
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But if they get the virus, they can pass it on to somebody to who does have somebody vulnerable in their house or workplace You are framing it as a situation where personal actions can only have consequences for that person That is not the case, the consequences are passed on to others
|
|||
t_rAndy
Robbie Keane Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 26217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
We haven’t seen if level 2 with household bans will work as we haven’t tried it yet. We also haven’t seen if level 5 is as effective as they think it will be. |
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
But the consequence is ever growing virus spread which reinforces that circle of hospitalisation and ICU admittance The consequence of increased hospitalisations and ICU admittance is lockdowns because the consequence of not locking down is the overwhelming of the health system and a significant increase in all cause mortality And I very much doubt most people are prepared to accept this So we need to discuss what it is that people are really prepared to accept There is a dishonesty in public discourse about this Again, we need a long term strategy and this is where the debate needs to move |
|||
sid waddell
Roy Keane On a dark desert highway Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Status: Offline Points: 12173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
This is not the narrative we are seeing on social media Which shows that social media is not necessarily representative https://twitter.com/businessposthq/status/1320288992487723008 |
|||
t_rAndy
Robbie Keane Joined: 06 Feb 2008 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 26217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yes I know the worst case scenario is that someone at the gathering had the virus and it passes to you and then from you to others but if we want to eliminate the risk then we should lock down completely because there is just as much risk (probably more) that your child brings it home from school. I know every little helps so the more we do, the more we reduce and I do think household visits should be banned at the moment but I can see why people will take the risk because as said, the risk is there anyway as we have only locked down some things but not others.
|
|||
JohnSwift
Kevin Kilbane Joined: 03 Jun 2016 Status: Offline Points: 327 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nothing dumb about it. I’ve just made the personal decision that I want to live with the virus and get on with life as much as I can. I’ll wear a mask and practice social distancing to try and protect others. Actually now that I think of it, that’s not much different to the fella looking to get on tv at Walkinstown Roundabout - perhaps it’s a case of Dumb and Dumber and Dumberer! |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 406407408409410 839> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |