players' rating vs the Rock

Randolph-7

Randolph 6

pre Madonna wrote: Randolph 8-  Brilliant save at a crucial time Coleman 4 - Far from the worst out there Duffy      2- Why does he think he is Ronald Koeman or Lothar Matthaus? Keogh     3- Little better Stevens   3- Did he complete a pass Doherty   4- Similar to Coleman. A bizarre substitution Hendrick 3- He got the goal, he was dire otherwise. Hiding against Gibraltar is just embarrassing. Hourihane 2- He had a couple of decent set-pieces, but was atrocious in general play. His passing is pitiful McClean-1 For turning up. A waste of a jersey. You would expect some fight from him, tonught his fight amounted to a stupid yellow card and nothing else. McGoldrick- 0 Pitiful. Hopefully he changes boots for Tuesday, the concrete ones aren't working Maguire- 1 The one is for the eyebrows.

Fitz wrote: pre Madonna wrote: Randolph 8-  Brilliant save at a crucial time Coleman 4 - Far from the worst out there Duffy      2- Why does he think he is Ronald Koeman or Lothar Matthaus? Keogh     3- Little better Stevens   3- Did he complete a pass Doherty   4- Similar to Coleman. A bizarre substitution Hendrick 3- He got the goal, he was dire otherwise. Hiding against Gibraltar is just embarrassing. Hourihane 2- He had a couple of decent set-pieces, but was atrocious in general play. His passing is pitiful McClean-1 For turning up. A waste of a jersey. You would expect some fight from him, tonught his fight amounted to a stupid yellow card and nothing else. McGoldrick- 0 Pitiful. Hopefully he changes boots for Tuesday, the concrete ones aren't working Maguire- 1 The one is for the eyebrows.   Houriane 2, and Maguire better than McGoldrick?? My god, you are a crank and a half!

pre Madonna wrote: You may be right about Hourihane, I am willing to knock him down to 1. Maguire and McGoldrick were equally as bad as each other, but Maguire has the eyebrows.

Fitz wrote: pre Madonna wrote: You may be right about Hourihane, I am willing to knock him down to 1. Maguire and McGoldrick were equally as bad as each other, but Maguire has the eyebrows. If you’re taking the mick, fair enough, but if you really think Hourihane didn’t have a decent first-half, then I don’t know what planet you’re on tbh.

Lads this malarkey about hendrick is bull. He had a decent game today. Got on the ball loads and his finish was composed. Way better than he has been in recent games. He could score 5 goals in a game and some of ye would still find fault. Him and hourihane were pretty good today i thought. Its the same every game on here regards jeff. 

pre Madonna wrote: Fitz wrote: pre Madonna wrote: You may be right about Hourihane, I am willing to knock him down to 1. Maguire and McGoldrick were equally as bad as each other, but Maguire has the eyebrows. If you’re taking the mick, fair enough, but if you really think Hourihane didn’t have a decent first-half, then I don’t know what planet you’re on tbh.  You have to be taking the piss! They were the better team for the first twenty minutes!We couldn't get a hold of the ball in the midfield for the whole game. Both Hendrick and Hourihane should be embarrassed and ashamed. If that is him being decent then he should retire.

The flack Hendrick takes is bizarre alright, literally our only midfielder capable of dribbling past opposition players. Had a pretty good game today topped off with a good goal. Himself and Arter is our best midfield pairing, two players who are actually competent on the ball and don't sh*t themselves at the slightest hint of pressure.