VAR sytem

Ya its getting beyond a joke now. 

Ah me arse. Look at Pukki yesterday. Can anyone actually see where he was offside even with all the lines cause i couldn't. Now we have got to the point where its almost is there any reason i can't award the goal. Gimme me back a dodgy linesman/woman decision anyday. Fcuk this sh*te.

Losing that is the worst thing about VAR. 

An offside should be clear. Get rid of all the lines. If you have to draw lines, let it go.  

Bye Bren siya.

gazurtoids wrote: Well...... could be just my anti scouse bias,

There's your problem in a nutshell. A camera is not biased, and can't be conned. It provides the VAR, (and the ref should he decide to inform himself by looking at the monitor) with all the evidence he needs to implement the laws of the game and make the correct decision.

Roberto Baggio wrote: Van Dijk handled it, then passed it to Lallana who then “passed” it to Mane who scored   Can anyone please explain

Fine. Van Dijk did not handle the ball, Lallana did not handle the ball, Mane was not offside. Therefore the goal was the correct decision.

horsebox wrote: Nothing in that and no doubt it's extremely harsh on Norwich.

VAR use different angles and have even thinner lines available than what we see on tv. They are calibrated, so if you're off, you're off. It's like being caught doing 31kph in a 30kph zone. You're still caught. And there's no point arguing that it's not dangerous. If it says 31, you face the consequences.

VAR implements the law as it stands, not as people want it to be. There's no way around it. If you want to change the law, then fine change the law. But that just means putting the line somewhere else, and you will still have nerds protesting about frame rates. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and if you're caught beyond it, then you have gained an advantage and your goal will not stand. That is the law and it will be enforced from now on.