VAR sytem

The problem with VAR isn’t VAR itself, it is the lack of clarity in the rules. I am pretty sure I said similar on here when it was first introduced. One referee will see it as handball and another won’t, which is a similar inconsistency to the goalkeeper encroaching at a penalty kick. 

That’s why you have ten minute debates, when it should’ve thirty seconds at most.

I'll stand over my comments on the CL penalty being a mistake, and the VAR rushed it for some reason, and missed the initial touch on Sissokos chest meaning it can't be a penalty. It's been done to death recently.

The 2 WC penalties. The ball is clearly in play when Jesus is hacked down by Kompany. Huge mistake that results in Brazil being knocked out. Would you like to look at the replays again and correct your wrong opinion of it? Spain players were rugby tackled when a free kick came into the box, I don't recall any offside. I must look at it again myself.

You are hilarious. No matter what VAR give, you say it is correct. You do realise that this isn't a black or white computer system, it's still humans making the final decisions? Humans who are consistently making incorrect football calls with and without the VAR.

As Nvidic says it should be a good system but it's a complete mess at the moment. A part of that mess is no doubt to do with some farcical directives regarding the laws of the game as PM mentions. It's a complete farce when you can have 2 similar situations in consecutive matches, 1 given as a penalty - 1 waved away. This exact situation happened in the Nigeria Argentina game at the WC last year when the ball hit Rojo on the arm. No penalty. Exact same situation in the Portugal game earlier that day iirc, penalty given. I presume you believe both of those decisions were correct Planning?

I am a fan if VAR and think it's good.and just needs a few tweaks.  What from my post gave  you the impression I wasn't. 

 handball in the box equals penalty  a ball deflected onto a players own arm like Sissoko, will never be a penalty again. That was already clarified, but you just keep driving on with the same nonsense. The CL penalty decision was a mistake. They didn't take long enough to see the initial contact with the chest is the only plausible explanation.

As for the Brazil WC penalty. It's a penalty. There is no disputing it. Jesus is fouled. The ball is still in play when he is fouled. How are you disputing any of that? If in the exact same situation VAR had awarded a penalty, my guess is you'd say they were correct in their judgement, no?