The disgraced John Delaney

I think Bob's point is that it's easy to be outraged and vocal about it yet, when the main man was in charge, nothing was actively being done to change things.

The point seems to be that there are plenty coming out criticising Delaney after the horse has bolted but did little enough when Delaney was in charge and is implicitly contrasting it with what plenty of others on here and off here were doing: protesting, organising, coming up with a mandate for change, getting people to sign up to it, engaging with the FAI on foot of that mandate, and trying to effect change, but without being compromised by involvement with the FAI, and avoiding what otherwise appears to be empty criticism or what could easily be dismissed by the FAI as hurling from the ditch.

That seemed to me to be the basis of the question but I could be wrong. It does come across that it could be an ad hominem attack but it doesn't seem to be the most egregious example; it's not awful to ask someone to show what they did when Delaney was in charge.

Would be typical fai given its a success story

Meh tbh. If that's what you take from mine and others input on this thread today. Meh.

I immediately thought of Rangers trying to fix their accounts and this sketch 

Minister already wasn't going, neither were Sport Ireland, all this would have been was a charade. In the current climate and entirely because of the FAI's own behaviour previously, some will equate accountability to being at the beck and call of politicians to appear before them and justify their existence, it isn't. They are better off working on their refinancing (if that proves possible, which it may not- but one way or another, that issue will have to be settled definitively) and getting on with the appointment of their independent directors than providing some backbenchers with air time.