Natalie Sawyer

lassassinblanc wrote: How this thread has gone

MC Hammered wrote: You don't have to assume offence on behalf of womankind. There seems to be a race to see who can be the most right on. I remember on the LSL forum back in the day, there was a thread similar to battle of the babes on here but filled with Facebook pics of local non celeb girls. The voting system was the same. A girl I know found out her pics were featured and she was delighted. She set up a heap of profiles to ensure extra votes were going her way and try to get herself through to the latter stages of the contest. She was fuming when she was knocked out.

On fire with the gifs lassie

How this thread has gone

Baldrick wrote: Seems that a lot of comment from some men is sex is something you do to the woman rather than with.

Baldrick wrote: Stickittotheman wrote: Baldrick wrote: Seems that a lot of comment from some men is sex is something you do to the woman rather than with. Coyne's comment is prime example. Come off it, that's not a very fair comment. Men are visual, this is nature. Therefore we tend to see ceetain women body parts as highly desireabe. We then talk about them. Women are not so visual. Partly because they don't need an erection to have sex. Women want us to behave like women when we are not. We are built completely different. What's unfair about it. It's to do with the language used in whatsapp groups and online. Obviously there is nothing wrong admiring a woman visually. But look at coynes comment as an example. It goes beyond that. By the way. Some posters have said women comment the same way so are calling double standards.    Now you are saying the opposite and are saying that we are built differently and comment on the visual. Which is it. Is it not possible to admire someone's beauty but also be respectful to them as a person. Of course it is but many people don't.

I said women are not as visual. Of course they are visual to a certain degree but nowhere near as much as us. Another thing is male bravado and ego. Again a natural in built instinct. It permeates all aspects of life- fair enough saying something more like she is gorgeous with a cracker body is a lot more acceptable than some other comments but how long before that becomes taboo as well.

Stickittotheman wrote: Baldrick wrote: Seems that a lot of comment from some men is sex is something you do to the woman rather than with. Coyne's comment is prime example. Come off it, that's not a very fair comment. Men are visual, this is nature. Therefore we tend to see ceetain women body parts as highly desireabe. We then talk about them. Women are not so visual. Partly because they don't need an erection to have sex. Women want us to behave like women when we are not. We are built completely different.

What's unfair about it. It's to do with the language used in whatsapp groups and online. Obviously there is nothing wrong admiring a woman visually. But look at coynes comment as an example. It goes beyond that.

By the way. Some posters have said women comment the same way so are calling double standards.    Now you are saying the opposite and are saying that we are built differently and comment on the visual. Which is it.

Is it not possible to admire someone's beauty but also be respectful to them as a person. Of course it is but many people don't.

Edited by Baldrick - 31 Mar 2018 at 6:18pm

Baldrick wrote: Seems that a lot of comment from some men is sex is something you do to the woman rather than with. Coyne's comment is prime example.

Come off it, that's not a very fair comment. Men are visual, this is nature. Therefore we tend to see ceetain women body parts as highly desireabe. We then talk about them. Women are not so visual. Partly because they don't need an erection to have sex. Women want us to behave like women when we are not. We are built completely different.

Seems that a lot of comment from some men is sex is something you do to the woman rather than with. Coyne's comment is prime example.