English Clubs and New Stadiums |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | |||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Terri, Arsenal have been on a terminal decline since they moved stadiums. When they left Highbury they were Champions League finalists and had won several titles in the preceding years (including the “invincibles”). Since leaving they have won two FA Cups, but have fallen off the top table, and they have become almost an “upper mid-table club”. In fact, their star has fallen so much that numerous players have left for major UK rivals since they moved. It’s a long time since their top players were only leaving for Barca and Juve.
With Spurs, it’s too early to tell whether this will be a major build in their efforts to actually win trophies. But I would have considered their first season in their new ground to be mixed. Also, Leicester have played in several divisions since their move to their new stadium after leaving Filbert Street. They dropped quickly before rising to win the PL. |
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
In the old days, when there wasn't a huge amount of money in the game and the teams were more equal in wealth, good management was the key to significant success - see eg Brian Clough. These days it isn't enough to have good management, you also need to give your management the resources (money) to go with it - see eg Klopp at Liverpool or Guardiola at City. Arsenal's problem was that they financed their move at the expense of their team, just at the very time when Wenger began to lose his touch. It was inevitable that they would fall back. But even then, they've still managed to keep well ahead of middling teams like Everton, Newcastle, WHU or Villa. Spurs meantime had excellent management in Redknapp and Poch, who managed to punch above their weight on a restricted playing budget for 5 or 6 seasons. But as we're now seeing, they've not been able to keep it up permanently. For as my figures from my earlier post clearly demonstrate, it is exceptionally hard to compete consistently with the Big Boys unless you also have the financial muscle to keep up with them. And with TV money still relatively equally distributed, and new billionaire owners prevented from just pouring money into clubs like a decade or two ago, then the need for clubs to generate their own increased revenues is becoming ever more vital in that respect. On which point, a large, modern, well-designed stadium is a crucial component for entering the Financial Big League. Otherwise such well-known tightwads as the Glazers, Kronke and Lewis/Levy wouldn't be investing their clubs' money in such ventures - they can see the need/benefits over the long term. Which also explains why Forhad Moshiri, formerly of Arsenal btw, has made it his first priority to push through a new stadium for Everton after previous, half-hearted plans for a rebuilt or new stadium had repeatedly stalled, as the team foundered on the pitch. P.S. I'd love it if Arsenal's decline really was "terminal", but if Arteta turns out to be the manager people like Guardiola say he can be, then I could see him at least stopping the rot. Whether they then begin to climb back up would depend on whether Kronke releases the finance to get rid of the rubbish and replace them with proper players.
Edited by Territorial - 20 Apr 2020 at 5:51pm |
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Those questioning why clubs like Everton should bother trying to keep up with the Big Clubs by moving to a new stadium, might like to consider this report by Kieran Maguire, football expert at the University of Liverpool School of Management. Basically he says that Spurs are now the most financially valuable club in England, by a combination of sound management and control (low wage bill etc) and "... a 'highly commercial' stadium with continuous earning potential." Of course it's no use generating the money if you're not going to spend it on reinforcing the team as and when needed. But by the same token, you can't spend it if you don't have it in the first place... Note how Everton don't even make the Top Ten.
Edited by Territorial - 29 Apr 2020 at 4:50pm |
|||
Shedite
Jack Charlton Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Status: Offline Points: 9820 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
And my point is that moving to a stadium isn't going to get you success, it's a very small factor. Look at West Ham and their big modern stadium, competing for Europe and in your top 10 list. Oh wait!
|
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The answer was in the first sentence, with Maguire having already established a sound reputation in this field: Different analysts use different methods to come to their conclusion and whether eg Burnley are 12th in the EPL or Everton should be 8th etc is not the point. Rather it is that he credits their new stadium and its revenue generating potential as a key factor in Spurs' ride to, or towards, the top.
Dear oh dear. No one said that moving stadium in itself will guarantee success. In fact if you move to the wrong stadium for the wrong reasons, then it can actually harm your club e.g. WHU. But by the same token, if you move to the right stadium for the right reasons, it can help you build success eg Man City. This is because a modern new and larger stadium can permit a club to generate greater financial resources. Of course, it is no use having extra money if you don't manage it in the right way. But if you don't have it in the first place, it won't matter how good your management is, you simply will not be able to compete consistently at the top over the long term. And right now, Everton need all the financial help they can get, since they're falling ever further behind season-by-season. Which is only what their previous owner (Kenwright) recognised, but couldn't pull off, and what their new owner (Moshiri) accepts and is determined to put right. Them and the Everton fanbase: "The
fans were asked to choose among three potential development options:
And they overwhelmingly backed the choice of Kings Dock. 15,049 votes were cast in favour of Kings Dock, with just 2,349 voting to redevelop Goodison Park." https://www.toffeeweb.com/club/kings-dock/new-stadium.asp But what do they know, eh? Edited by Territorial - 29 Apr 2020 at 7:51pm |
|||
Jackal
Liam Brady Joined: 14 Sep 2019 Status: Offline Points: 1357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
The problem with these new stadiums is the people you lose and the people that replace them. A lot of Arsenal's normal fans were priced out and replaced with tourists and non traditional fans.
It's like Croke Park being moved out to a field miles past Lucan. There'd be no traditional pub or meeting place outside the stadium and all tickets would be at least €80.
|
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Pricing and distribution is a problem for Arsenal's marketing and ticketing dept to sort out. But it's no worse than the previous situation at Highbury where a capacity restricted to 48k(?) meant that seats were blocked by Season Ticket holders, meaning that new, younger fans and locals etc, couldn't get a ticket. Which in turn meant that the fanbase was becoming ever older and/or touts were making a killing selling their unused season tickets at outrageous prices which only tourists and non-traditional fans could/would pay anyway. Meanwhile, the club couldn't raise extra revenue at Highbury by continually increasing ticket prices, since people would no longer pay 21st century prices for 20th century facilities. It was similar at Spurs, when I was something like No. 34,000 on the ST waiting list for the old WHL, when the whole capacity was only 36k!
I don't think anyone is happy about stadium moves like that (bar property developers and asset strippers?) But it needn't be like that. Arsenal moved something like 500 yards and Spurs rebuilt on the old site. Meanwhile, Everton fans were up in arms when the club originally planned to relocate out of the city altogether to a retail park in Kirkby a few years back. But they're happy enough with Kings Dock, since it's only a mile or two from Goodison and is just as central. And while Brentford fans are nostalgic about leaving Griffin Park for Lionel Road, they accept that it has to happen and are relieved/delighted that the club is staying local: (GP on the left, with LR on the right. Obviously.) EDIT: Dunno why the pic doesn't work - try: https://griffinpark.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21598&d=1588060784 Edited by Territorial - 29 Apr 2020 at 11:24pm |
|||
Jackal
Liam Brady Joined: 14 Sep 2019 Status: Offline Points: 1357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
What facilities has the Emirates got that Highbury didn't have. I mean from a fan point of view? All you need is a seat, a chipper, a bar and a toilet. What more do people want or need going to match? I understand the increase in capacity for tourists.
Edited by Jackal - 30 Apr 2020 at 12:09am |
|||
Shedite
Jack Charlton Joined: 09 Dec 2011 Status: Offline Points: 9820 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Claret Murph
Paul McGrath Hmmm, Goodness, I must say Joined: 16 Apr 2009 Location: Tibet Status: Offline Points: 15742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
On a Burnley site a lot of people are trying to work out how the Clarets are in the top ten also
|
|||
Lansdowne Road debut aged 52 and 201 days .
|
|||
thebronze14
Jack Charlton Derry City Til I Die Joined: 22 Feb 2011 Location: Dublin/Donegal Status: Offline Points: 7172 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
All of which leaves football a whole lot less enjoyable and interesting...At this stage I'd rather go to Linfield v Ballymena than Arsenal v Liverpool. If I didn't have a love for Southampton I'd barely follow top flight English football at all
|
|||
pre Madonna
Robbie Keane I am MALDING Joined: 30 Nov 2014 Location: Trumpton Status: Offline Points: 44659 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I would have far more interest in Linfield against Ballymena. Football is about community, watching two clubs reliant on and part of their community is far, far closer to what the game is about than two multinational franchises selling something that isn't real. How to sell soul to a soulless people who sold their sold...
|
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
No, not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying is that if a club like Everton are going to compete at the level which a club of their status and history should be at, as well as everything else (direction, management, infrastructure, academy etc) they also need revenues to match the other big clubs. And part of that revenue comes from having a modern stadium which is fit for purpose in the 21st century, rather than a mid-20th century stadium which is becoming increasingly costly to maintain. So of course corporate boxes and hospitality are part of it, but in their case, Kings Dock will also allow another 12k fans in, with the potential for more in future. Considering Goodison sells out every game even with a crap team while the other lot across the park are all-conquering, it shows just how much demand there is for more capacity. Not only that, but it will provide facilities fit for disabled, women and families etc, who were shamefully neglected by football clubs for years before legislation and the Taylor Report demanded that that was addressed. Or do you imagine that such supporters don't count? All of which is before we get to safety for all the fans - something else which was also neglected in the old grounds. (I could tell you how I was nearly crushed in the away end at Highbury, along with several hundred others) But maybe you still live in a 1970's house, drink in a 1970's pub and stay in a 1970's hotel in Blackpool each summer when you fancy a holiday? Because in football terms, that is what Goodison is. |
|||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10646 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Well if the plans that are doing the rounds about the champions league come to pass, it won’t make a difference where you play your football.
|
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
My in-laws are all Evertonians to the core and I've also been to Goodison a couple of times recently, so I have some insight into what their fanbase thinks. All I've seen and heard tells me that much as they all love Goodison, their fans are intelligent enough to know that they have to move in order to be able to compete, for financial and other reasons. And I don't think I'm mistaken in that: "The
fans were asked to choose among three potential development options:
And they overwhelmingly backed the choice of Kings Dock. 15,049 votes were cast in favour of Kings Dock, with just 2,349 voting to redevelop Goodison Park." But heyho, maybe you know more about it than them? Or perhaps you just posess the "soul" that they all lack? |
|||
Jackal
Liam Brady Joined: 14 Sep 2019 Status: Offline Points: 1357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So what do the fans need from a new stadium?
|
|||
Territorial
Jack Charlton Joined: 25 Nov 2014 Status: Offline Points: 5817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
First and foremost they need to be able to buy a ticket. And Kings Dock will allow another 12k of them to do so, with potential for more in future. (Still won't clear the ST waiting list, mind). And if you're female, with a family or disabled (esp), then you need decent access, facilities and safety. Beyond that, there are a load of things to do with comfort and choice etc which may not be absolutely essential, but which are increasingly desirable. After all, if fans are being charged 21st century ticket prices, then they have a right to expect 21st century standards.
|
|||
Jackal
Liam Brady Joined: 14 Sep 2019 Status: Offline Points: 1357 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Right, so it's a new disability section. Nothing else is needed so.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |