Russian Invasion of Ukraine |
Post Reply | Page <1 177178179180181 212> |
Author | ||||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
But only from a certain persuasion that chooses to see America’s hand in everything.
|
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Well I dont think its that. They have had a hand in Ukranian politics for atleast quite a while. 2004, 2014 and currently. That is nothing about having a persuasion. We can agree that We see them as an empire of sorts. So We have an empire of sorts that has been involved in Ukranian affairs. This isnt even getting into the weeks of finanical or possible military ops.
|
||||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
And Russia has had a hand in Ukrainian politics. That is a legitimate issue too. Especially as that hand was a lot more prevalent. Is it not a coincidence that Putin first invaded Ukraine in 2014, months after a visible and tangible change in mindset by the population?
Edited by Het-field - 11 Apr 2024 at 6:32pm |
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Absolutely. Both parties were meddling there
|
||||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
And now we’re getting somewhere! Why didn’t Russia stop meddling when it lost control? Why did it need to meddle further by way of invasion?
|
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
because they are out for their own ends for many many reasons and one is contril
And both empires are st the same thing
|
||||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
But not in this context. They may exhibit similar mindsets in different circumstances. But not here. Only one illegally and unilaterally invaded Ukraine, and it’s not America.
|
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Correct about the invasion. Incorrect about meddling in another countries affairs to their own ends. Both empires were at it. This time Russia threatened. And the US tried to call their bluff. Once they realised it was too late they arrogantly thought they could beat Russia through military and sanctions. |
||||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
So which is it NATO called their bluff, or the US called their bluff? If NATO or the US actually involved themselves in the way they did when intervening in Yugoslavia in 1999 they’d have swept Russia away in weeks.
|
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
sorry we are veering here. We should stick to talking about interference in Ukraine pre invasion and sort that first.
The likes of transcript I shared shows a level of interference which is colonial in nature. They have no given right to carry on like that. Now don't forget that was a leak..can you just imagine what We never hear
|
||||
eireland
Ray Houghton Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 4546 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Do you boys reckon Russia didn't cripple Ukraines energy infrastructure day 1 because they thought they'd walk it and take over?
Ukraine's air defence was good when activated and even improved but with missile stocks dropping to low levels Russia are now hurting then bad in this regard. Crazy to think the US want's Ukraine to stop hitting refineries when they're getting hit hard themselves. Lucky it didn't happen during the winter.
|
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
I dont know to be honest. Putin did say He was only after the eastern part and that the attack on Kiev was to disable communications. I wouldnt know who to trust but thats actually how its turned out. I didnt know US wants Ukraine to stop hitting refineries. But there again I wouldnt necessarily trust them either. The Fear factor of the Energy Crisis was big at the start of the war. And Then the gas pipelines got attacked. Still no one wants to know who did it in the Western World. We can draw your own conclusions of that.
|
||||
eireland
Ray Houghton Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 4546 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
If Russia captured Kyiv there's no way they wouldn't lay claim to such a prized possession. They'd say it's now a Russian city. The Americans don't want unstable oil prices in an election year so they Russia to be able to export and not use dwindled supplies for themselves only.
|
||||
OohAah...
Ray Houghton Joined: 09 Apr 2011 Location: Ireland Status: Online Points: 3539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Id say so. The plan may have been if We get to take Kiev its a plus but also the main aim couldve been what they said to disable communications and then also it may have served as just a distraction. Do you remember being told the russians only have old tanks and its all they have and it shows how weak the Russian army is. You may well be right about that and to me it shows their power and control in this war.
|
||||
eireland
Ray Houghton Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 4546 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
It's true about the tanks but it's also true for Ukraine. Even the Leo's and Abrams are quite old.
|
||||
Mush Cassidys Donkey
Kevin Kilbane Joined: 16 Feb 2024 Status: Online Points: 445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
Putin had no interest in taking Kiev. It was basically a shot across the bow to get the yanks and Ukraine to the negotiation table, which did happen. Every single military expert has said this upon review of the events that the initial force of 40k troops was insignificant. If Putin was intent on taking Kiev along with Western Ukraine he would have mobilized over 1m troops with heavy machinery behind it. The initial army that was mobilized was less than 1% of Russia's military force. That tells its on story in itself.
|
||||
eireland
Ray Houghton Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Status: Offline Points: 4546 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
The you see the amount of armour Destroyed North and East of Kyiv? Russia failed to secure the airfield. They had a fleet of cargo planes full of reinforcements ready to fly in if they achieved their initial goal. Unfortunately for you they didn't.
|
||||
Het-field
Roy Keane By Appointment to His Majesty The King Joined: 08 Mar 2016 Status: Online Points: 10782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||
No, RFK said that about the 40k troops.
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 177178179180181 212> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |