You Boys in Green Homepage YBIG Shop
Forum Home Forum Home : Other Forums : Whatever!
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Russian Invasion of Ukraine
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Russian Invasion of Ukraine

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 177178179180181 212>
Author
Message
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 3:17pm
But only from a certain persuasion that chooses to see America’s hand in everything. 
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 3:37pm
Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

But only from a certain persuasion that chooses to see America’s hand in everything. 

Well I dont think its that. They have had a hand in Ukranian politics for atleast quite a while. 2004, 2014 and currently. That is nothing about having a persuasion. We can agree that We see them as an empire of sorts. So We have an empire of sorts that has been involved in Ukranian affairs. This isnt even getting into the weeks of finanical or possible military ops.
Back to Top
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 6:31pm
Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

But only from a certain persuasion that chooses to see America’s hand in everything. 

Well I dont think its that. They have had a hand in Ukranian politics for atleast quite a while. 2004, 2014 and currently. That is nothing about having a persuasion. We can agree that We see them as an empire of sorts. So We have an empire of sorts that has been involved in Ukranian affairs. This isnt even getting into the weeks of finanical or possible military ops.

And Russia has had a hand in Ukrainian politics. That is a legitimate issue too. Especially as that hand was a lot more prevalent. Is it not a coincidence that Putin first invaded Ukraine in 2014, months after a visible and tangible change in mindset by the population? 


Edited by Het-field - 11 Apr 2024 at 6:32pm
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 6:45pm
Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

But only from a certain persuasion that chooses to see America’s hand in everything. 

Well I dont think its that. They have had a hand in Ukranian politics for atleast quite a while. 2004, 2014 and currently. That is nothing about having a persuasion. We can agree that We see them as an empire of sorts. So We have an empire of sorts that has been involved in Ukranian affairs. This isnt even getting into the weeks of finanical or possible military ops.

And Russia has had a hand in Ukrainian politics. That is a legitimate issue too. Especially as that hand was a lot more prevalent. Is it not a coincidence that Putin first invaded Ukraine in 2014, months after a visible and tangible change in mindset by the population? 

Absolutely.  Both parties were meddling there
Back to Top
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 7:00pm
Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

But only from a certain persuasion that chooses to see America’s hand in everything. 

Well I dont think its that. They have had a hand in Ukranian politics for atleast quite a while. 2004, 2014 and currently. That is nothing about having a persuasion. We can agree that We see them as an empire of sorts. So We have an empire of sorts that has been involved in Ukranian affairs. This isnt even getting into the weeks of finanical or possible military ops.

And Russia has had a hand in Ukrainian politics. That is a legitimate issue too. Especially as that hand was a lot more prevalent. Is it not a coincidence that Putin first invaded Ukraine in 2014, months after a visible and tangible change in mindset by the population? 

Absolutely.  Both parties were meddling there

And now we’re getting somewhere! Why didn’t Russia stop meddling when it lost control? Why did it need to meddle further by way of invasion?
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 8:18pm
because they are out for their own ends for many many reasons and one is contril
 And both empires are st the same thing 
Back to Top
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 9:06pm
Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

because they are out for their own ends for many many reasons and one is contril
 And both empires are st the same thing 

But not in this context. They may exhibit similar mindsets in different circumstances. But not here. Only one illegally and unilaterally invaded Ukraine, and it’s not America.
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 9:12pm
Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

because they are out for their own ends for many many reasons and one is contril
 And both empires are st the same thing 

But not in this context. They may exhibit similar mindsets in different circumstances. But not here. Only one illegally and unilaterally invaded Ukraine, and it’s not America.

Correct about the invasion. Incorrect about meddling in another countries affairs to their own ends. Both empires were at it. This time Russia threatened. And the US tried to call their bluff. Once they realised it was too late they arrogantly thought they could beat Russia through military and sanctions. 


Back to Top
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 9:17pm
Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by Het-field Het-field wrote:

Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

because they are out for their own ends for many many reasons and one is contril
 And both empires are st the same thing 

But not in this context. They may exhibit similar mindsets in different circumstances. But not here. Only one illegally and unilaterally invaded Ukraine, and it’s not America.

Correct about the invasion. Incorrect about meddling in another countries affairs to their own ends. Both empires were at it. This time Russia threatened. And the US tried to call their bluff. Once they realised it was too late they arrogantly thought they could beat Russia through military and sanctions. 



So which is it NATO called their bluff, or the US called their bluff? If NATO or the US actually involved themselves in the way they did when intervening in Yugoslavia in 1999 they’d have swept Russia away in weeks. 
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 9:23pm
sorry we are veering here. We should stick to talking about interference in Ukraine pre invasion and sort that first. 
The likes of transcript I shared shows a level of interference  which is colonial in nature. They have no given right to carry on like that. Now don't forget that was a leak..can you just imagine what We never hear
Back to Top
eireland View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 4546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Apr 2024 at 10:17pm
Do you boys reckon Russia didn't cripple Ukraines energy infrastructure day 1 because they thought they'd walk it and take over?

Ukraine's air defence was good when activated and even improved but with missile stocks dropping to low levels Russia are now hurting then bad in this regard. Crazy to think the US want's Ukraine to stop hitting refineries when they're getting hit hard themselves. Lucky it didn't happen during the winter.
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 9:27am
Originally posted by eireland eireland wrote:

Do you boys reckon Russia didn't cripple Ukraines energy infrastructure day 1 because they thought they'd walk it and take over?

Ukraine's air defence was good when activated and even improved but with missile stocks dropping to low levels Russia are now hurting then bad in this regard. Crazy to think the US want's Ukraine to stop hitting refineries when they're getting hit hard themselves. Lucky it didn't happen during the winter.

I dont know to be honest. Putin did say He was only after the eastern part and that the attack on Kiev was to disable communications. I wouldnt know who to trust but thats actually how its turned out.

I didnt know US wants Ukraine to stop hitting refineries. But there again I wouldnt necessarily trust them either. 

The Fear factor of the Energy Crisis was big at the start of the war. And Then the gas pipelines got attacked. Still no one wants to know who did it in the Western World. We can draw your own conclusions of that.
Back to Top
eireland View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 4546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 11:15am
Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by eireland eireland wrote:

Do you boys reckon Russia didn't cripple Ukraines energy infrastructure day 1 because they thought they'd walk it and take over?

Ukraine's air defence was good when activated and even improved but with missile stocks dropping to low levels Russia are now hurting then bad in this regard. Crazy to think the US want's Ukraine to stop hitting refineries when they're getting hit hard themselves. Lucky it didn't happen during the winter.

I dont know to be honest. Putin did say He was only after the eastern part and that the attack on Kiev was to disable communications. I wouldnt know who to trust but thats actually how its turned out.

I didnt know US wants Ukraine to stop hitting refineries. But there again I wouldnt necessarily trust them either. 

The Fear factor of the Energy Crisis was big at the start of the war. And Then the gas pipelines got attacked. Still no one wants to know who did it in the Western World. We can draw your own conclusions of that.
If Russia captured Kyiv there's no way they wouldn't lay claim to such a prized possession. They'd say it's now a Russian city. 

The Americans don't want unstable oil prices in an election year so they Russia to be able to export and not use dwindled supplies for themselves only.
Back to Top
OohAah... View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 09 Apr 2011
Location: Ireland
Status: Online
Points: 3539
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote OohAah... Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 11:24am
Originally posted by eireland eireland wrote:

Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by eireland eireland wrote:

Do you boys reckon Russia didn't cripple Ukraines energy infrastructure day 1 because they thought they'd walk it and take over?

Ukraine's air defence was good when activated and even improved but with missile stocks dropping to low levels Russia are now hurting then bad in this regard. Crazy to think the US want's Ukraine to stop hitting refineries when they're getting hit hard themselves. Lucky it didn't happen during the winter.

I dont know to be honest. Putin did say He was only after the eastern part and that the attack on Kiev was to disable communications. I wouldnt know who to trust but thats actually how its turned out.

I didnt know US wants Ukraine to stop hitting refineries. But there again I wouldnt necessarily trust them either. 

The Fear factor of the Energy Crisis was big at the start of the war. And Then the gas pipelines got attacked. Still no one wants to know who did it in the Western World. We can draw your own conclusions of that.
If Russia captured Kyiv there's no way they wouldn't lay claim to such a prized possession. They'd say it's now a Russian city. 

The Americans don't want unstable oil prices in an election year so they Russia to be able to export and not use dwindled supplies for themselves only.

Id say so. The plan may have been if We get to take Kiev its a plus but also the main aim couldve been what they said to disable communications and then also it may have served as just a distraction. Do you remember being told the russians only have old tanks and its all they have and it shows how weak the Russian army is.

You may well be right about that and to me it shows their power and control in this war.
Back to Top
eireland View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 4546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 11:37am
Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by eireland eireland wrote:

Originally posted by OohAah... OohAah... wrote:

Originally posted by eireland eireland wrote:

Do you boys reckon Russia didn't cripple Ukraines energy infrastructure day 1 because they thought they'd walk it and take over?

Ukraine's air defence was good when activated and even improved but with missile stocks dropping to low levels Russia are now hurting then bad in this regard. Crazy to think the US want's Ukraine to stop hitting refineries when they're getting hit hard themselves. Lucky it didn't happen during the winter.

I dont know to be honest. Putin did say He was only after the eastern part and that the attack on Kiev was to disable communications. I wouldnt know who to trust but thats actually how its turned out.

I didnt know US wants Ukraine to stop hitting refineries. But there again I wouldnt necessarily trust them either. 

The Fear factor of the Energy Crisis was big at the start of the war. And Then the gas pipelines got attacked. Still no one wants to know who did it in the Western World. We can draw your own conclusions of that.
If Russia captured Kyiv there's no way they wouldn't lay claim to such a prized possession. They'd say it's now a Russian city. 

The Americans don't want unstable oil prices in an election year so they Russia to be able to export and not use dwindled supplies for themselves only.

Id say so. The plan may have been if We get to take Kiev its a plus but also the main aim couldve been what they said to disable communications and then also it may have served as just a distraction. Do you remember being told the russians only have old tanks and its all they have and it shows how weak the Russian army is.

You may well be right about that and to me it shows their power and control in this war.
It's true about the tanks but it's also true for Ukraine. Even the Leo's and Abrams are quite old. 
Back to Top
Mush Cassidys Donkey View Drop Down
Kevin Kilbane
Kevin Kilbane


Joined: 16 Feb 2024
Status: Online
Points: 445
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mush Cassidys Donkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 11:52am
Putin had no interest in taking Kiev. It was basically a shot across the bow to get the yanks and Ukraine to the negotiation table, which did happen. Every single military expert has said this upon review of the events that the initial force of 40k troops was insignificant. If Putin was intent on taking Kiev along with Western Ukraine he would have mobilized over 1m troops with heavy machinery behind it. The initial army that was mobilized was less than 1% of Russia's military force. That tells its on story in itself. 
Back to Top
eireland View Drop Down
Ray Houghton
Ray Houghton


Joined: 12 Feb 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 4546
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote eireland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 12:07pm
Originally posted by Mush Cassidys Donkey Mush Cassidys Donkey wrote:

Putin had no interest in taking Kiev. It was basically a shot across the bow to get the yanks and Ukraine to the negotiation table, which did happen. Every single military expert has said this upon review of the events that the initial force of 40k troops was insignificant. If Putin was intent on taking Kiev along with Western Ukraine he would have mobilized over 1m troops with heavy machinery behind it. The initial army that was mobilized was less than 1% of Russia's military force. That tells its on story in itself. 
The you see the amount of armour Destroyed North and East of Kyiv? 

Russia failed to secure the airfield. They had a fleet of cargo planes full of reinforcements ready to fly in if they achieved their initial goal. Unfortunately for you they didn't.
Back to Top
Het-field View Drop Down
Roy Keane
Roy Keane

By Appointment to His Majesty The King

Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Status: Online
Points: 10782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Het-field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2024 at 12:17pm
Originally posted by Mush Cassidys Donkey Mush Cassidys Donkey wrote:

Putin had no interest in taking Kiev. It was basically a shot across the bow to get the yanks and Ukraine to the negotiation table, which did happen. Every single military expert has said this upon review of the events that the initial force of 40k troops was insignificant. If Putin was intent on taking Kiev along with Western Ukraine he would have mobilized over 1m troops with heavy machinery behind it. The initial army that was mobilized was less than 1% of Russia's military force. That tells its on story in itself. 

No, RFK said that about the 40k troops.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 177178179180181 212>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.00
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.