| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The GerK 
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 3:29pm |
 Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHAT? she literally says it after three seconds.
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him.
|
 |
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 3:39pm |
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHO officials have openly admitted larger donors make decisions. I'll try source quote.
And there is this
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him.
Not sure why you are out betting for someone who hobknobbed around the world with Epstein, TBH
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 3:44pm |
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHAT? she literally says it after three seconds.
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him. |
If you've not watched the whole clip that you shared then I'll bow out here as this isn't an argument I can win.
|
|
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 3:45pm |
Currently, WHO has full control over only about a quarter of its budget,” said Gostin.
“WHO therefore can't set the global health agenda and has had to do the bidding of rich donors, not only rich nations in Europe and North America, but also rich philanthropies such as the Gates Foundation”.
Gates controls 88 per cent of the remaining three quarters.
You're swimming against the tide here. His control over world health is unquestionable amd when treaty is passed in May, even more so.
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 3:46pm |
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHO officials have openly admitted larger donors make decisions. I'll try source quote.
And there is this
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him.
Not sure why you are out betting for someone who hobknobbed around the world with Epstein, TBH |
I'm batting for nothing other than separating fact from opinion. Bill Gates is an irrelevance to me.
|
|
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 3:56pm |
|
Well you did bring him up. I think I have factually backed up my claims at this stage.
Edited by The GerK - 03 Jan 2024 at 3:59pm
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 4:00pm |
The GerK wrote:
Well you did bring him up. I think I have factually backed up my claims at this stage.
|
Really? I'll leave others to offer opinions on that.
|
|
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 4:41pm |
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Well you did bring him up. I think I have factually backed up my claims at this stage.
|
Really? I'll leave others to offer opinions on that. |
You didn't even hear the world "But" in the Melinda Gates interview so I'll just leave it at that.
But if you want to point out which point you think is not true, I'll happily go on
Edited by The GerK - 03 Jan 2024 at 4:43pm
|
|
McG
Moderator Group
SISAO? What the hell is SISAO?
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Location: Christmas Island
Status: Offline
Points: 26998
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:40pm |
|
Thread well and truly ruined
|
|
YBIG Table Quiz winner 2016 & 2017
AS YOU WERE McGx
|
|
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:42pm |
McG wrote:
Thread well and truly ruined |
That's just a conspiracy theory
|
|
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:47pm |
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHAT? she literally says it after three seconds.
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him. |
If you've not watched the whole clip that you shared then I'll bow out here as this isn't an argument I can win. |
McG is right. Thread will be ruined so.my last offering.
You can't win argument because you haven't watched the full clip.
She says it wasn't one thing it was many things that led to divorce.
When asked about Epstein a few mjns later, she says "it wasn't one thing, it was many things BUT I didn't not like friendship with Epstein."
She uses that line twice and makes it abundantly clear this had a major role in divorce.
Full clip here
https://youtu.be/CTy7P9iEMbg?si=vKSiOwGEkJcGOrbi
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:53pm |
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHAT? she literally says it after three seconds.
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him. |
If you've not watched the whole clip that you shared then I'll bow out here as this isn't an argument I can win. |
McG is right. Thread will be ruined so.my last offering.
You can't win argument because you haven't watched the full clip.
She says it wasn't one thing it was many things that led to divorce.
When asked about Epstein a few mjns later, she says "it wasn't one thing, it was many things BUT I didn't not like friendship with Epstein."
She uses that line twice and makes it abundantly clear this had a major role in divorce.
Full clip here
https://youtu.be/CTy7P9iEMbg?si=vKSiOwGEkJcGOrbi |
Perfect, thanks for proving my point. What you said originally - She divorced him because of his relationship with Epstein. What you've now confirmed that the clip says - She divorced him due to a number of factors, one of which was his relationship with Epstein.
|
|
SeaSharp
Liam Brady
Joined: 09 Jun 2022
Location: Ingerlund
Status: Offline
Points: 1856
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 5:58pm |
McG wrote:
Thread well and truly ruined |
There was only one way a thread about conspiracy theories was gonna go 
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 6:00pm |
SeaSharp wrote:
McG wrote:
Thread well and truly ruined |
There was only one way a thread about conspiracy theories was gonna go |
Down a big black hole!
|
|
The GerK
Moderator Group
Razor you wanna pint?...2 minutes later
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 20485
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 6:31pm |
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHAT? she literally says it after three seconds.
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him. |
If you've not watched the whole clip that you shared then I'll bow out here as this isn't an argument I can win. |
McG is right. Thread will be ruined so.my last offering.
You can't win argument because you haven't watched the full clip.
She says it wasn't one thing it was many things that led to divorce.
When asked about Epstein a few mjns later, she says "it wasn't one thing, it was many things BUT I didn't not like friendship with Epstein."
She uses that line twice and makes it abundantly clear this had a major role in divorce.
Full clip here
https://youtu.be/CTy7P9iEMbg?si=vKSiOwGEkJcGOrbi |
Perfect, thanks for proving my point. What you said originally - She divorced him because of his relationship with Epstein. What you've now confirmed that the clip says - She divorced him due to a number of factors, one of which was his relationship with Epstein.
|
Jesus
Someone revive the Thick Thread
|
|
cliffrichard
Liam Brady
Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 1235
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 7:05pm |
Must be a few Irish specific ones?
Third secret of Fatima? Fairy rings? The Mayo Curse?
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 7:22pm |
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
Borussia wrote:
The GerK wrote:
And just to be clear, are you suggesting his relationship with the paedophile is opinion and not fact? |
No - I'd say there is a fair chance that he is on the list that will be released soon. But barring one NY York Times report which states this was part of the reason his ex-wife met with lawyers originally I don't see anything anywhere that categorically says that this was the sole reason for his divorce. |
So you are haply enough that the Epstein friendship is fact as is his control over WHO?
We are now down Melinda. In her own words....
There is very big "but" in this chat.
And remember, Gates kept meeting Epstein after allegations came out.
|
Melinda in her own words - "there wasn't one thing or one incident that caused this. Your original post was that she divorced him because of it which would appear to be a misrepresentation of facts. If you are trying to prove something then the likes of this discredits any argument. |
You are missing a very big word from quote above....BUT.
If that's not enough for you....suit yourself. You claimed I posted a serious of opinions and not facts and this is the best you can do when I post the sources?
|
You are right that I didn't quote the remainder of that sentence but I can confirm she doesn't use "but" anywhere in there. You can watch it back yourself.
Let's move on to the WHO admitting themselves that Bill Gates has effective control over them - Who said that and when? The opinion piece from Swiss Info doesn't cover that so I'm assuming it was somebody else on behalf of the WHO who said this. |
WHAT? she literally says it after three seconds.
“It was many things. But I did not like that he’d had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein,” she told CBS Mornings’ Gayle King. “I made that clear to him. |
If you've not watched the whole clip that you shared then I'll bow out here as this isn't an argument I can win. |
McG is right. Thread will be ruined so.my last offering.
You can't win argument because you haven't watched the full clip.
She says it wasn't one thing it was many things that led to divorce.
When asked about Epstein a few mjns later, she says "it wasn't one thing, it was many things BUT I didn't not like friendship with Epstein."
She uses that line twice and makes it abundantly clear this had a major role in divorce.
Full clip here
https://youtu.be/CTy7P9iEMbg?si=vKSiOwGEkJcGOrbi |
Perfect, thanks for proving my point. What you said originally - She divorced him because of his relationship with Epstein. What you've now confirmed that the clip says - She divorced him due to a number of factors, one of which was his relationship with Epstein.
|
Jesus
Someone revive the Thick Thread |
"Bill, whose own wife divorced him over his close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?"
|
|
Borussia
Roy Keane
Joined: 14 Oct 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 10750
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Jan 2024 at 7:23pm |
cliffrichard wrote:
Must be a few Irish specific ones?
Third secret of Fatima? Fairy rings? The Mayo Curse? |
Ewan MacKenna's twitter feed will have loads more Irish ones for you!
Edited by Borussia - 03 Jan 2024 at 7:23pm
|
|
Tweet
